NEW DELHI: Lok Sabha on Tuesday passed a Constitution amendment bill to restore the power of states to make their own OBC lists after a thaw in the logjam as Opposition parties backed the legislation but demanded the removal of the 50 per cent cap on reservation and many of them also called for a caste-based census.
With the Opposition seeking to corner the ruling BJP over the sensitive issue of quota, Social Justice and Empowerment Minister Virendra Kumar said there is a need for careful examination of the demand made by several Lok Sabha members for increasing the cap of reservation beyond 50 per cent as constitutional issues are involved.
For the first time since the Monsoon session of Parliament began on July 19, Lok Sabha witnessed a debate in an orderly manner as the Opposition put its protests demanding a debate over the Pegasus snooping allegations on hold for The Constitution (One Hundred and Twenty-Seventh Amendment) Bill, 2021 which was passed with 385 members voting in support and no member opposing it.
The bill was passed as the 105th Constitution Amendment bill after being renumbered.
Due to Covid protocols, some members of the House were seated in visitors galleries and therefore the division on amendments and the passage of the bill was conducted manually using slips.
Moving the bill for consideration and passage, Kumar described the bill as a historic legislation as 671 castes in the country would benefit from it.
The 102nd Constitution Amendment Act of 2018 inserted articles 338B, which deals with the structure, duties and powers of the National Commission for Backward Classes, and 342A that deals with the powers of the president to notify a particular caste as Socially and Educationally Backward Communities (SEBCs) and the power of Parliament to change the list.
Article 366 (26C) defines SEBCs.
The Supreme Court had dismissed the Centre's plea seeking a review of its May 5 majority verdict that held that the 102nd Constitution amendment took away the states' power to notify SEBCs for the grant of quota in jobs and admissions.
Many leaders such as BJP ally JD(U)'s Lalan Singh, Samajwadi Party's Akhilesh Yadav, BSP's Ritesh Pandey and DMK's T R Baalu pitched for a caste-based census be conducted throughout the country.
Several Opposition parties, including the Congress, demanded a removal of the 50 per cent cap on reservations, while the government underlined its commitment to social justice.
Initiating the debate, Congress leader in Lok Sabha Adhir Ranjan Chowdhury extended his party's wholehearted support to the bill but criticised the government for the 2018 amendment, saying had the government inserted the suggestion proposed by the Opposition, today's situation would not have arisen.
"You tweaked the Constitution by bringing the 102 Constitution Amendment Bill in 2018 which gave people opportunity to go to the court and finally the Supreme Court removed the states' power," he said.
Chowdhury also slammed the government for allegedly running away from debate on the issue of "snooping" through the Pegasus spyware, saying the country after country like Hungary, the US and Israel have ordered probe into the controversial issue.
"We support this bill but our demand is to remove 50 per cent ceiling (in reservation). You should listen to states, make it legal for states to cross the 50 per cent ceiling," Chowdhury said.
DMK's Baalu and SP's Yadav also demanded the removal of 50 per cent ceiling in reservation.
Replying to the debate, Kumar said there is a need for careful examination of the demand made by several Lok Sabha members for increasing the cap of reservation beyond 50 per cent as constitutional issues are involved.
The government is aware of the wishes of the members, he said.
It has been repeatedly emphasised (by courts) that the reservation cap should be retained at 50 per cent.
"Therefore, it is necessary to carefully examine all constitutional and legal aspects in this regard," the minister said.
He stated that in the Indra Sawhney case, the court has observed that the limit can be increased beyond 50 per cent only in certain special circumstances.
Intervening in the debate, Labour and Employment Minister Bhupender Yadav asserted that maximum measures to have been taken at a fast pace to ensure justice for Dalits, OBCs and the poor by the Modi government.
Hitting out at the Congress, Yadav said the Constitution makers had made a provision for reservation for backward classes, but when the Congress came to power in 1950, it ruled for 40 years but did not give justice to the backward classes.
"When for the first time a non-Congress government came to power, the Janata Party, the Mandal Commission was created. It had submitted its report in 1980 and you (the Congress) ran the government after that but did not implement it and did not give reservation to backward classes," Yadav said.
Hitting out at the UPA, Yadav said that it was in power from 2004-14 but did not give constitutional status to the commission for backward classes which was also done by the Modi government.
"This bill seeks to fulfil the basic aim and spirit of our constitution makers to build a country in which people get social, economic and political justice on the basis of equality," he said.
Participating in the discussion, Supriya Sure (NCP) said the credit should for this amendment bill should be given to the Maharashtra government which requested the Centre to do address the issue of OBC reservation.
Sule said another important issue along with this legislation is to address the 50 per cent ceiling on reservation without which the amendment will not fully resolve the issue.
YSR Congress Party and Shiv Sena also voiced support for the bill.
All India Majlis-e-Ittehad-ul-Muslimeen Asaduddin Owaisi accused the government of using OBCs as a vote bank, saying little has been done to uplift the community in actual terms.
He also turned to the Treasury benches and used the Hindi song line -- "jab pyaar kiya toh darna kya" while exhorting the government to remove the 50 per cent cap on reservation.
Hasnain Masoodi (NC) accused the government of breaking federal structure of the country by dividing Jammu and Kashmir into two union territories.
He wondered if the government can downgrade other 28 states into union territories.
Harsimrat Kaur Badal (SAD) wanted the House to discuss the issue of farmers who have been sitting on the roads for months.
She said although the government had promised income of farmers but it has ended up increasing prices causing more hardship to the poor.
The Constitution amendment bill requires that there should be a majority of the total membership of the House and by a majority of not less than two-thirds of the members of that House present and voting.
‘Bring law to breach quota ceiling of 50%’
After the leader of the Congress in the Lok Sabha, Adhir Ranjan Chaudhury, argued for legislative intervention to breach the 50%, the chorus only grew with the likes of T R Baalu (DMK) and Akhilesh Yadav (SP) calling for caste census and expanding the OBC quota, saying a number of backward castes are being deprived of their rights.
“Whether you do it or not, when the SP comes back to power in UP we will order caste census,” said Yadav during the debate. Nationalist Congress Party (NCP) MP Supriya Sule sought to put the BJP in a spot, asking for the release of the SECC, 2011 data.
She said, “This 50% issue will still be problem for us(in Maharashtra).”
The decision to accord 27% OBC quota in graduate and post-graduate all India medical courses as part of the BJP’s poll pitch had preceded the Constitution (127) Amendment Bill.
The Bihar poll verdict had recently given the proof of the arrival of the OBC politics, with smaller caste-based political outfits tilting electoral balance.
Such smaller parties are keeping their larger counterparts on the toes in UP, with the BJP also seemingly bending over backwards to induct Anupriya Patel of Apna Dal in the Union Council of ministers.
Bill gets 385 votes
The Bill was passed with 385 members voting in its favour and none opposing it. Some amendments moved by opposition members were rejected by the House.
(With ENS Inputs)