Elgar case: HC seeks Uddhav government's reply on pleas of Rona Wilson, Shoma Sen

Wilson and Sen filed their pleas in the HC earlier this year, citing the report of US-based firm Arsenal Consulting which claimed electronic evidence had been planted on Wilson's computer.

Published: 04th May 2021 05:29 PM  |   Last Updated: 04th May 2021 05:29 PM   |  A+A-

Bombay High Court

Bombay High Court (File Photo | PTI)


MUMBAI: The Bombay High Court on Tuesday directed the Maharashtra government to file its replies to petitions filed by activists Rona Wilson and Shoma Sen, seeking quashing of charges against them in the Elgar Parishad-Maoist links case.

A bench of Justices S S Shinde and Manish Pitale also directed the NIA, which is conducting a probe into the case, to file its reply to Sen's petition.

Wilson and Sen filed their pleas in the HC earlier this year, citing the report of US-based firm Arsenal Consulting which claimed electronic evidence had been planted on Wilson's computer.

The petitioners claimed such tampering of evidence had been done to frame Wilson and his co-accused in the case.

Last week, the National Investigation Agency (NIA) filed its reply to Wilson's plea and disputed the US firm's report.

The probe agency said it was refuting the allegations and claims made in the report, and urged the HC to dismiss Wilson's plea.

On Tuesday, Additional Solicitor General Anil Singh, who appeared for the NIA, sought additional time to file a reply to Sen's plea.

The petitioners' counsel, senior advocate Indira Jaising, told the HC that in the pleas they had also challenged the sanction granted by the Maharashtra government in 2018 to prosecute the petitioners under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA).

She claimed the sanction had been granted without due application of mind.

Since the state was the sanctioning authority, it must file its reply to both the pleas, she said.

Jaising further claimed the then Investigating Officer (IO) in the case, Shivaji Pawar, had failed to provide all paperwork to the sanctioning authority, and that he suppressed information, particularly on the question of tampering of the electronic evidence.

"The IO in this case failed to record that there was tampering of the computer belonging to the petitioner," Jaising said.

She said the IO, who was also a party to the case, must be directed to file an independent reply to the pleas.

The Maharashtra government's counsel, advocate Deepak Thakare, sought four weeks for the state to file its replies.

Thakre also said he would take instructions on whether the IO could respond as a party to the case.

The HC will hear the petitions further on June 16.

The case relates to alleged inflammatory speeches delivered at the Elgar Parishad conclave, held in Pune on December 31, 2017, which the police claimed triggered violence the next day near the Koregaon-Bhima war memorial located on the city's outskirts.

The Pune police claimed the conclave was backed by Maoists.

India Matters


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp