No limitation of territory when apex court nominates CBI to conduct probe, says SC

'We are very clear, once this court appoints CBI to investigate a crime, the jurisdiction is vested by virtue of the court order,' said a bench of justices A M Khanwilkar and C T Ravikumar.

Published: 01st October 2021 11:40 PM  |   Last Updated: 01st October 2021 11:40 PM   |  A+A-

Supreme Court

Supreme Court. (Photo | EPS)

By PTI

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court Friday said when the CBI is nominated and entrusted with the investigation of a case by the apex court, there is no limitation of territory, and the jurisdiction is vested across India to probe that matter.

"We are very clear, once this court appoints CBI to investigate a crime, the jurisdiction is vested by virtue of the court order," said a bench of justices A M Khanwilkar and C T Ravikumar.

The bench further said, "when the appointment is made by the court, there is no limitation on CBI about territory."

The top court was hearing a plea against the order of the Punjab and Haryana High Court which had dismissed the petitions raising the issue of territorial jurisdiction in a matter probed by the CBI.

The high court had passed the order on the pleas seeking setting aside of the October 2016 order of a special judge, CBI, Patiala, dismissing the petitions for dropping the proceedings on the alleged ground that the CBI does not have the territorial jurisdiction to register a case in Jammu regarding alleged abduction and killing of a man in Punjab.

The CBI had earlier told the trial court that the case was registered at Jammu after the probe agency had conducted a preliminary enquiry in compliance with the November 1995 order passed by the apex court.

While hearing the matter on Friday, the apex court observed that when the CBI is nominated by the court order, jurisdiction is vested in the probe agency across India to investigate that case.

The trial court had noted that a case was registered by the CBI in February 1997 at Jammu alleging abduction and killing of a person in Punjab.

It had been noted that the charge sheet was prepared at Jammu by the CBI and it was filed before it.

The applicants before the trial court had claimed that registration of the case at Jammu was illegal as no part of the alleged offence was committed within Jammu and Kashmir.

The CBI had argued before the trial court that in compliance with the November 1995 order passed by the apex court in a petition pertaining to the "mass cremation of unidentified dead bodies by the Punjab Police", a preliminary enquiry was registered by the agency in December 1995.

It had said that during the enquiry, this case was registered in February 1997.

The CBI had also told the trial court that on the basis of the result of the preliminary enquiry, various cases were registered, and to cope up with a load of investigation, the case was registered at CBI Jammu.



Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp