A status report submitted on behalf of various high courts before the Supreme Court has highlighted the unhygienic condition of washrooms in court complexes across the country, describing it as a persistent violation of fundamental rights and the right to dignity of judges, advocates, litigants, and staff.
The report noted that unhygienic washrooms in court complexes reflected systemic and administrative failure in allocating funds, enforcing maintenance contracts and ensuring accountability.
"The existing infrastructure fails to meet the standards of a modern and inclusive public utility; it directly implicates the failure to ensure public health and sanitation.
"The absence of facilities for Persons with Disabilities (PwD) in major high courts and district courts constitutes a violation of their right to equality and non-discrimination, mandated by the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act; this lack includes non-compliant construction, absence of ramps, support bars, and appropriate turning for wheelchairs," the status report said.
The submissions were made in a PIL filed by lawyer Rajeeb Kalita.
The petition further flagged the absense of gender neutral/inclusive washrooms for the third gender in most court complexes, noting that it disregards the fundamental rights and dignity of people.
"The lack of functional crèche/childcare facilities (even where established) negatively impacts the right to practice a profession for female advocates and staff who are mothers, creating a barrier to gender equality in the legal profession.
"The situation is most critical in the subordinate judiciary, reflecting a profound infrastructure inequity. There is a need for micro-level development. What is required is decentralised implementation, focusing on local needs assessment, specific budget allocation, and community-level oversight to ensure functional water supply, plumbing, and daily cleaning contracts for every single court complex," the status report said.
The apex court was informed that the poor state of these facilities affects the working conditions of judicial officers and staff in courts, especially located in rural areas, potentially impacting their health and efficiency, and diminishing the dignity of the institution of justice itself.
The apex court had on January 15 passed a slew of directions, saying the availability of public toilets is an important duty of the state governments and Union territories and steps need to be taken to ensure that such facilities are accessible to all.
Issuing a slew of directions, the apex court asked all the high courts, state governments and UTs to ensure the availability of separate toilet facilities for males, females, persons with disabilities, and transgender persons in all court premises and tribunals across the country.
