Why the media missed the 'tsuNAMO'

Pundits don’t go beyond the moth-eaten script that sees everything through the prism of ‘secularism’ and Hindu communalism.

Published: 14th March 2017 01:00 AM  |   Last Updated: 13th March 2017 11:14 PM   |  A+A-

The Bharatiya Janata Party’s spectacular victory in Uttar Pradesh and its impressive performance in three other states has stunned commentators and psephologists alike. The eventual outcome in this unforgettable electoral battle was nowhere near what most political pundits were churning out as considered analysis or what pollsters were predicting in their pre-poll surveys and even exit polls. It seemed as if mainstream media—both print and television—had lost the capacity to step back and dispassionately view the electoral drama as it unfolded. One of the prime reasons for this is the deep-seated prejudice and even hatred for Prime Minister Narendra Modi and the BJP among commentators and the unwillingness to go beyond the moth-eaten script that sees everything through the prism of so-called secularism and Hindu communalism. As per this narrative—largely pushed by Nehruvians and their Marxist friends—the Nehruvians are the good guys in Indian politics. The Marxists, who ride piggyback on the Nehruvians are also, by association, good guys. Those who have a nationalist bent of mind are the bad guys and those who represent regional political forces are to be tolerated and manipulated whenever necessary.

The Nehruvian and Marxist schools have permeated the media, specially the English media, the academia and the bureaucracy over the last seventy years and ensured that much of the discourse is along the lines scripted by them. Therefore, it is fashionable to be Nehruvian or left-leaning. Those who do not conform to these two schools are to be treated as pariahs and generally kept away from the upper echelons of the editorial departments.

Coming back to UP 2017, since the media, dominated by these two schools, views everything through this prism, they were unwilling to go beyond this template of the electoral battle being a Maha Yuddh between “secular” forces and Hindu Communalists! As the results show, they went horribly wrong because the people did not perceive their so-called secular parties as “secular”. Nor did they perceive Modi and his party as a bunch of Hindu communalists! In reality, it was a battle between retrograde forces like the Congress Party, the Samajwadi Party (SP) and Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP)—who were bombarding the people with divisive, decrepit slogans of an old India—and Prime Minister Modi, who was offering the youth and the aspirational classes a new India in which the mool mantra would be equal opportunities for everyone. This media also got it completely wrong when it came to demonetisation.

Although the poorest of the poor, who stood in long queues for hours, backed Modi to the hilt on this, influential sections of the media never saw this. It also did not see that Modi had through his fair implementation of policies such as Ujjwal (providing cooking gas connections free to women from BPL households), the Jan-Dhan Yojana and the low-premium insurance scheme for the poor, had over the last two years, quietly entered the hearts and hearths of the poor.

It is here that one can draw a comparison between him and Indira Gandhi. She too caught the imagination of the poor and spoke ad nauseum about banishing poverty (Garibi Hatao), but had no plan to execute it. The comparison must end here, because Modi’s ability to execute his ideas is of a different level altogether. While she nationalised banks and squandered public money on bogus loan melas in which the beneficiaries were often Congress workers, Modi got  a mind-boggling 250 million poor citizens to open bank accounts.

The media also lost track of the fact that Modi never played the communal card in this election. He only spoke of  development policies that would embrace everyone. Since the media is used to a staple diet of communal or caste conflict in electoral politics, it refused to believe that the prime minister was seeking votes on the most secular agenda of them all—development! In any case, the media believed that development is not “sexy” enough to garner votes!

There are several messages emanating from Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand and Manipur and from Orissa and Maharastra, which witnessed panchayat and municipal elections recently. It is now obvious that the people see Modi as a decisive leader who can take tough decisions and re-build a strong and united India. They are worried about the fissiparous tendencies that are growing in the country and the overt and covert support that the Congress Party and left-leaning elements in our polity are lending to those who are trying to weaken the unity and integrity of India.  The strange developments in university campuses in New Delhi and West Bengal, where students, supported by the Left, are heard shouting Bharat ko Tudke, Tukde Karenge (We will break-up India) has unnerved the average Indian. Further, he is unable to understand how leaders of many national and regional parties could support Kashmiri militants and others who are raising secessionist slogans. The vulgar appeasement of religious minorities and the divisive politics of many regional and caste-based parties has also become a matter of concern.

Finally, the country is yet to recover from the wobbly coalition that Manmohan Singh headed for ten years, which enfeebled the country and raised serious doubts about our ability to govern ourselves. Overall, after a lapse of three decades, there is a national mood building up in favour of a robust, over-arching national party headed by a strong leader who can take tough decisions and keep the country together. The mood is against unstable coalitions, parties which play denominational politics and parties like the two communist parties playing the treacherous game of encouraging centrifugal forces. And, who can fix all this? Modi, of course!

The author is Chairman, Prasar Bharati



Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp