For Maldives, an anti-india tilt is not practical

Just as well that China decided not to bite Maldivian presidential envoy Mohamed Saeed’s bait to provide ‘security’ to its investments in the archipelago.

Published: 12th February 2018 04:00 AM  |   Last Updated: 12th February 2018 03:00 AM   |  A+A-

Just as well that China decided not to bite Maldivian presidential envoy Mohamed Saeed’s bait to provide ‘security’ to its investments in the archipelago. Beijing has tentatively and diplomatically sidestepped the prospect of opening yet another front with India. If it had agreed to put boots on the ground, India too would have had little option but to respond precipitately. It has till now chosen not to get directly embroiled in the turmoil. New Delhi has held its counsel and not responded to President Abdulla Yameen’s primary rival Mohamed Nasheed’s overtures for ‘physical’ intervention after the dramatic standoff between the regime and the island nation’s Supreme Court.

India and China have been getting increasingly drawn into rehearsing their shadow battle in the South Asian neighbourhood. Beijing is deploying its economic muscle in New Delhi’s traditional domain of influence, encircling its markets via a capture of the access points around it. After Hambantota and Gwadar, it’s now playing for access to the 1.5 degree channel in the Indian Ocean. The Maldives crisis merely brings to the front stage the games Yameen has sought to play ever since he signed the Free Trade Agreement with Beijing, opening his country’s markets to cheap Chinese produce. That dimmed the spark of his FTA offer to India, not to speak of New Delhi’s existing 1981 trade pact with Malé, by which all essential commodities were being supplied in exchange for fish.

China, in actual fact, has been looking covetously at not the Maldivian market but the expansive Indian one, and New Delhi rightly suspects its engagement with smaller neighbours is meant to secure future access. New Delhi obviously needs to  drop niceties when it’s called for. Malé should also learn what Kathmandu has, the hard way: a decisive tilt away from India is not practical. China cannot become a replacement for India, strategically or otherwise. China too would do well to recall that trade and commerce cannot flourish through conflict and boots on the ground, in a post-colonial world.

Stay up to date on all the latest Editorials news with The New Indian Express App. Download now
(Get the news that matters from New Indian Express on WhatsApp. Click this link and hit 'Click to Subscribe'. Follow the instructions after that.)


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp