Legislature has only itself to blame for SC intervention

Amidst all the debate over the Citizenship (Amendment) Act, two significant developments have gone by without getting the attention they deserved.

Published: 28th January 2020 04:00 AM  |   Last Updated: 28th January 2020 10:07 AM   |  A+A-

A view of Supreme Court . (File | EPS)

A view of Supreme Court . (File | EPS)

Amidst all the debate over the Citizenship (Amendment) Act, two significant developments have gone by without getting the attention they deserved.

One is the Supreme Court ruling on a crucial aspect of the anti-defection law, limiting the time-frame within which the House presiding officers—the Speaker or Chairperson—can decide on disqualification petitions.

The other is a Supreme Court direction to the Election Commission to come up with a framework to help curb criminalisation of politics. Both refine the set of rules relating to people’s representatives and political parties (a surrogate vehicle of democratic processes)—with the court setting itself up almost as a kind of clergy in between the people and their representatives. 

To be sure, a three-month deadline to decide on matters of disqualification—for a  member switching sides or abandoning the party he/she got elected from—is welcome.

However, the judicial insinuation that a presiding officer may not be a non-partisan referee is dangerous.

It sanctifies as a given the idea that the presiding officer will act on behalf of the ruling dispensation, in the interest of the party he/she represents.

Yes, this may be borne out by ground reality.

Nonetheless, it puts to question the constitutional sanctity of the Speaker’s post—an erosion particularly visible in the court’s suggestion that Parliament set up a tribunal of sorts to adjudicate upon anti-defection cases, trimming the Speaker’s powers. 

As of now, ranks may close. Parliament is unlikely to pass laws curbing the Speaker’s role or debarring those chargesheeted in heinous crimes from elections. But this is a reality check, and introspection would be in order.

These are hallowed institutions whose sanctity the legislature is diminishing by its own irresponsible behaviour. That it leaves space for judicial commentary and intervention is truly only a symptom.   


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp