Change approach to mental illness

The understanding is that if interventions were widely available, a person with mental illness might be less likely to end up on the streets.

Published: 03rd August 2021 11:47 PM  |   Last Updated: 04th August 2021 08:05 AM   |  A+A-

Anxiety, Mental health, Suicide

Image used for representational purpose only

Recently, the National Health Mission and Greater Chennai Corporation joined forces to ‘rescue’ homeless persons with mental illness in the city with the aim of treating and rehabilitating them. News of the plan immediately raised concerns among activists as the civic body had embarked on a similar drive during the previous DMK regime in 2010. At the time, over 150 people who appeared homeless were rounded up and taken to a state hospital, screened for mental illness and allegedly forcibly detained. This time, the rescue efforts initiated showed that institutions had evolved somewhat. Mental health professionals were part of the process and the consent of the individuals was respected—to an extent. However, one-off attempts of this sort are problematic given that the needs of this vulnerable population are complex. Mental illness in itself cannot be seen purely from a medical perspective—environmental, economical and sociological factors all play a role. States cannot adopt a one-size-fits-all approach. Tamil Nadu acknowledges this and runs, in partnership with NGOs, Emergency Rescue and Crisis Centres at the district level. The understanding is that if interventions were widely available, a person with mental illness might be less likely to end up on the streets.

However, alongside that, sustained effort and engagement is required to reach out to people already on the streets rather than having them moved into institutions, temporary or otherwise. For this, the state must change its paternalistic view of persons with mental illness and adopt a rights-based approach as envisaged by the Mental Health Act of 2017. It stresses the need for informed consent and says that treatment must be provided in a setting that least infringes on a person’s rights.

In 2008, after a similar drive in Kanniyakumari resulted in a French national (with no mental illness) being certified and detained in the Institute of Mental Health, the Madras High Court said: “The police should not ‘round up’ people as if they were stray cattle and deal with them as such. Each individual should be dealt with as a separate case, he/she shall be treated as a human being with all constitutional rights.” About 13 years later, there is clearly a long way to go.


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp