Alagiri alleged that the amendments were designed to create communal unrest and urged the Supreme Court to ensure just provisions in its final verdict.
While Justice Khanna intended to protect the concept of ‘waqf by user’ at least partially, the interim verdict upheld the provision to axe ‘waqf by user’ prospectively
A batch of petitions before the apex court challenged the Act’s Constitutional validity, calling it discriminatory against Muslims and violative of fundamental rights.
