STOCK MARKET BSE NSE

Section of BCCI board members rue lost opportunity as COA urges SC to remove top officials

The cricket board members were regretting not implementing the Lodha Panel order, with a request of reviewing two-three contentious points.

Published: 17th August 2017 08:17 AM  |   Last Updated: 17th August 2017 08:17 AM   |  A+A-

File picture of CoA members Vinod Rai (R) and Diana Edulji (L)

Express News Service

CHENNAI: “We invited this. Didn’t we?” the reaction of a BCCI member summarised what several in the beleaguered body were thinking after news emerged on Wednesday that the CoA has sought the removal of its office-barers. Not for the first time, they were regretting letting go the opportunity of implementing the order, with a request of reviewing two-three contentious points.

The BCCI wasted this chance at its special general meeting on July 26, when instead of finalising those points, they added key recommendations in the list of ‘objectionable’ ones. It effectively meant that rather than conveying compliance, that meeting made the BCCI look more defiant, refusing to concede ground after having agreed to do so. Documents released by the CoA show that during the meeting, representatives Maharashtra, Hyderabad urged members to keep the list short.

They went to the extent of saying that adding issues like age and tenure cap will infuriate the judges and make matters worse. But in the end, consensus was it that all those be kept in the list of ‘objectionable’ points. “Not just that we had nothing to show for by way of initiating reforms. By adding points to that list we also sent a message that we continue to be on the path of confrontation. That way, it’s not surprising that the CoA has come down heavily on us.

In the process, we seem to have lost the faint chance of getting certain concessions,” a state unit head, who attended the SGM, told Express. In previous meetings, other than Maharashtra, representatives of Uttar Pradesh and Madhya Pradesh had also spoken in favour of keeping complications to the minimum and sending out a message that the state bodies are willing to comply.

Back then, it was often said that opposition from the N Srinivasan camp kept those suggestions from being accepted. In the July 26 meeting, there was no Srinivasan. “There is no point blaming individuals for the process getting stalled. At the end of the day, the BCCI collectively failed to reach consensus on accepting the court’s reform orders. Had a majority of members seen merit in falling in line, they would have spoken against those opposing them. Since that didn’t happen, it has to be assumed that they are on the same page,” said the president of another unit.

atreyo@newindianexpress.com

More from Cricket.

Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

IPL_2020
flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp