ICC shocker: Why Australia, Steven Smith should face stricter action for ball-tampering

Fans appalled as ICC hands Smith just one-match ban; veterans demand the entire Aussie team leadership be penalised, treated on par with match-fixing

Published: 26th March 2018 04:55 AM  |   Last Updated: 26th March 2018 09:19 AM   |  A+A-

Steve Smith and David Warner (AP)

Express News Service

CHENNAI: Banned for one Test for getting his players to work unfairly on the ball. That’s the penalty for Steve Smith in the Cape Town sandpaper saga.The ICC announced the decision on Sunday after its chief executive Dave Richardson levied the charge on the Australian skipper, which resulted in the suspension. Normally, the match referee does this. Only in cases that warrant special attention does the chief executive step in. The last time Richardson got into the act was in November 2016, when he fined South Africa captain Faf du Plessis 100% of his match fee for applying sugary saliva on the ball during a Test in Australia.

In Smith’s case, more than the sanction, the degree of it draws attention. A one-Test ban for an orchestrated attempt to change the condition of the ball? Here is an international captain admitting that he and his senior players were cheating and the penalty is lesser than what was given to Kagiso Rabada, who was banned for two Tests for acts of less grievous misconduct, which was eventually overturned.
“This is contrary to the spirit of the game... As captain, Smith must take full responsibility for the actions of his players,” said Richardson.

If the ICC deems Smith’s misconduct ‘serious’ enough, the punishment doesn’t appear appropriate. His offence is more serious than indiscretion in the heat of the moment. The pre-planned nature of the offence makes it rare on a cricket field and that’s why the penalty doesn’t seem exemplary enough.It can be argued that the ICC has followed the rule book. In that case, rules need revision. In football, players get banned for multiple games based on TV replays even if the wrongdoing goes unnoticed by the referee. This became law after it was seen that players are getting away with these. By sticking to rules instead of changing with times, the ICC is not doing its lenient image any good.

Curiously, Richardson himself admits that. “The ICC needs to do more to prevent poor behaviour and better police the spirit of the game, defining more clearly what is expected of players and enforcing the regulations in a consistent fashion,” he said in a statement. It’s up to the world body to act. Otherwise, cricket risks getting branded as a game run by a spineless administration.


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp