Financial Fair Play, Neymar deal explained

Let's take a look at the details of FFP and what it could mean for Neymar's world-record breaking move.

Published: 04th August 2017 01:04 AM  |   Last Updated: 04th August 2017 01:04 AM   |  A+A-

If Neymar was a country his net worth based on his bank-busting 222 million euros release clause would place him at 206th in the United Nations' list of nations by GDP ahead of the Marshall Islands and Palau. (File | AP)


PARIS: Spain's La Liga refused to accept a 220-million-euro ($260m) payment from Neymar for his move to Paris Saint-Germain from Barcelona on Thursday, with league president Javier Tebas claiming the transfer would make it impossible for PSG to comply with UEFA's Financial Fair Play (FFP) rules.

AFP Sport has taken a look at the details of FFP and what it could mean for Neymar's world-record breaking move.

What is Financial Fair Play?

Financial Fair Play was first approved by European football's governing body UEFA in 2010 to try and combat soaring debts in the game. From 2013-2015 clubs could only post an annual loss of 45 million euros, which was reduced to 30 million for the next three years, running until 2018. Investments in stadiums, training facilities, youth development and women's football are not included in the calculations, as UEFA want to encourage spending in those areas. UEFA explain FFP simply as "about improving the overall financial health of European club football".

What are the possible consequences?

Several big clubs have fallen foul of FFP rules in the past, including PSG, although total bans from European competition have been rare. The then English champions Manchester City and PSG were both given 60-million-euro fines, 40 million of which suspended, in 2014, and saw their squads for the Champions League cut from 25 to 21 players. Theoretically though, the sanctions could be far stricter for serious breaches of regulations, with UEFA listing "deduction of points", "disqualification from competitions" and "withdrawal of a title or award" as among the possible measures that can be taken against clubs.

Have PSG broken any rules?

La Liga certainly thinks so, but UEFA appeared to play down thoughts that PSG could see the move blocked on Thursday, saying that it was impossible to judge how the transfer would affect the club's balancing of the books in the long run. "The transfer of Neymar to PSG will have an effect on the club's finances over several years but the impact of such an operation cannot be judged in advance, notably as PSG could well sell several players for a significant amount," UEFA said in a statement to AFP. PSG triggered Neymar's buyout clause to make the deal, and Marcos Galera, a lawyer and founding member of Spanish sports law specialists Agaz, said that ultimately that would have to be accepted. "If you follow literally Spanish legislation, they had an indemnity clause agreed," he said. "And the rules are that if you have a clause agreed, you have to abide by it."

What are La Liga's motives?

La Liga are looking to defend their biggest clubs, Barcelona and Real Madrid, who have won all of the last four editions of the Champions League. The two Spanish giants have a worldwide fanbase to call on to drive their huge revenues through TV rights, commercial deals and ticketing. However, they are wary of PSG's Qatari owners avoiding FFP restrictions by using inflated sponsorship deals from Qatari companies way above market value. Tebas believes PSG cannot possibly comply with FFP without such deals and has labelled the system "financial doping."

Stay up to date on all the latest Football news with The New Indian Express App. Download now


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp