'Separate Andhra HC in Hyderabad Unconstitutional'

Published: 02nd May 2015 06:00 AM  |   Last Updated: 02nd May 2015 06:00 AM   |  A+A-

HYDERABAD:A division bench of the Hyderabad High Court on Friday made it clear that the “Constitution does not permit” a separate high court for Andhra Pradesh in Hyderabad, which is an integral part of the Telangana State, and also ruled that it would continue to be the common HC for both Telangana and Andhra Pradesh till a new HC for the latter was formed.

The Bench, comprising Chief Justice Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta and Justice PV Sanjay Kumar, delivered the verdict on petitions filed by T Dhangopal Rao, a social activist of the city, as well as the AP High Court Sadhana Committee and others, seeking separate high courts for AP and Telangana.

The Bench appreciated the gesture of the Telangana government in coming forward to provide logistic and infrastructure support for the formation of separate high courts but held that Telangana had no role to play in the creation of a separate High Court for AP.

The Bench ruled, “It is for the AP government to provide infrastructure and identify the place to set up its own High Court. Just earmarking a certain area for the new court by the government is not enough... it has to indicate the place where it has to be located. As soon as the AP government indicates the place, the High Court will initiate further steps for establishment of the court.”

The Bench asked the Central government to release funds as mentioned in the AP Reorganisation Act expeditiously. “We hope that the Centre will release funds for the creation and construction of a new High Court as promised under the AP Reorganisation Act 2014 as early as possible,” it said.

The Bench further said Section 51(3) of the State Reorganisation Act, 1956, allowed the AP government to set up circuit benches of the high court, if it desired, either in Tirupati or Visakhapatnam, but those benches would be functioning under the jurisdiction of the common high court till a separate high court was constituted.

The Bench had earlier sought responses from both the States and Union Government and also requested the assistance of two senior counsels as amicus curie.


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp