Centre has done a lot to set up educational institutions in AP: Iyr Krishna Rao

Out of  number of promises made in the AP Reorganisation Act the one on which there is a substantial progress relates to setting up of educational institutions of national importance.

Published: 23rd December 2018 01:48 AM  |   Last Updated: 23rd December 2018 06:49 AM   |  A+A-

Former chief secretary IYR Krishna Rao

Express News Service

Out of a number of promises made in the AP Reorganisation Act the one on which there is a substantial progress relates to setting up of educational institutions of national importance. This is covered under Section 93 of the Act which says the central government shall take all necessary measures as enumerated in the 13 Schedule for the progress and sustainable development of the successor States within a period of 10 years from the appointed day.

Schedule 13 of the Act is again divided into two portions, one relating to education and other relating to infrastructure. Under education heading it is made clear that Government Of  India shall take steps to establish institutions of national importance in  the successor State of Andhra Pradesh. These  include an IIT, IIM, NIT, IISER, Central University, Petroleum University, IIIT, Agricultural University, AIIMS, Tribal University and NIDM. The Act  envisages a period of 10 years for these institution to be set up  in the State.

It goes to the credit of both the Centre as well as the State government that most of  these institutions got established and became operational by 2015-16 though in temporary accommodation. The Act in fact provides full 10 year period for establishing these institutions. When the State government was keen on starting these institutions from the academic year 2015-16 even if they were to start in a temporary accommodation the Secretary in government of India concerned was very particular that these institutions should only be established after proper infrastructure was made available probably after four to five years.

But the State government was very keen and was able to politically work out establishment of these institutions even in temporary accommodation. If the central government was not forthcoming and cooperative these institutions would have taken their own time in getting established as is the case when they are established in other states. Having insisted on starting these institutions even in temporary  accommodation immediately it is now unfair of the State government to  accuse the central government of running them in temporary accommodation.

The second accusation  with reference to these institutions of national importance is that they require about `10,000 crores for their proper establishment  and at the rate of the present budgetary allocation it may take about 15 years for their completion. This accusation  is  baseless and mischievous. 

The budgetary allocations keep on going up from year to year depending upon the progress of the works and in any case no institution can absorb huge amounts in the very first year of its existence  and with enhanced allocations most of these institutions would be completed within a specified period of time.

This is not the first time such institutions are established in the country and they are established in a number of other states and same procedure will be followed here as well. In any case there will be directors for these institutions whose responsibility is to pursue with the Centre for their early completion. Ignoring all these facts taking upon themselves the responsibility which is not their the State government is unnecessarily making it an issue and trying to show government of India in bad light.

Regarding the institutions mentioned under infrastructure except  Dugarajapatnam port development all others as mentioned in the Act only talk of examining the feasibility of establishing those institutions and the time given for establishing them if found feasible is 10 years. Out of them the airports and the Vizag Chennai corridor as per my understanding are progressing well.

As far as Durgarajapatnam port is concerned central government seems to have requested the State government to suggest an alternative site in view of the environmental issues involved. The other organisations are in different stages of examination by the central government. All of them require huge investments and the Act provides a 10-year period for the Centre to take a decision. 

Aware of the huge investments involved in setting up those institutions and their commercial nature the then Congress government seems to have left it vague in the Act to examine the feasibility of  setting up of these institution instead of specifically stating that they should be established. 

When such are the provisions of the Act and when the Centre has done so much in establishing these institutions under Schedule 13, the State government has somehow successfully misrepresented the facts and made it look to the public as if nothing has happened under this head.

Iyr Krishna Rao

Former chief secretary of Andhra Pradesh

Stay up to date on all the latest Andhra Pradesh news with The New Indian Express App. Download now


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp