STOCK MARKET BSE NSE

AP HC judge takes potshots at SC Collegium

The High Court Judge said that former President APJ Abdul Kalam signed the declaration as he offered prayers at Tirumala temple with faith in Lord Venkateswara. 

Published: 31st December 2020 04:19 AM  |   Last Updated: 31st December 2020 08:47 AM   |  A+A-

By Express News Service

VIJAYAWADA: Justice Rakesh Kumar, senior judge of the High Court, on Wednesday expressed displeasure over the Supreme Court Collegium’s recommendation to transfer Chief Justice JK Maheswari to Sikkim, observing that “transfer of High Court Judges or its Chief Justices may reflect some transparency and for betterment or upliftment of the administration of justice. After all, they are also holding Constitutional post like member of Hon’ble Supreme Court Collegium.”

Justice Kumar, who is due to retire shortly, penned a strongly-worded judgement dismissing a petition filed by the government seeking his recusal in a case pertaining to the auction of government lands as part of Mission Build AP.

While rejecting the recusal plea, Justice Kumar directed that contempt proceedings be initiated against Pravin Kumar, Special Officer, Mission Build AP, for filing “untenable and malicious” petition and ordered that a criminal complaint be filed against him for perjury. 

Referring to Chief Minister YS Jagan Mohan Reddy’s controversial letter to the Chief Justice of India complaining of interference in the functioning of the High Court by a sitting Supreme Court judge, Justice Rakesh Kumar said he was not aware if any contempt proceeding was initiated against him but the fact remains that he succeeded in getting undue advantage at the present moment. “People may draw an inference as if after the so-called letter of Hon’ble Chief Minister, the two Chief Justices, i.e., Chief Justice of High Court for the State of Telangana and Chief Justice of High Court of AP have been transferred,” he observed.

He reasoned that because of the transfer of the Chief Justice, “naturally, the cases pending in the Court of Special Judge for CBI cases in Hyderabad against Jagan may be delayed” and the “State government may get undue benefit.” 

Pointing out that hearing on the Amaravati farmers’ issue by a bench headed by the Chief Justice was stopped soon after the collegium’s recommendation, Justice Rakesh Kumar opined that there is every likelihood that some time may be consumed in reconstitution of the Bench and when hearing resumes afresh.

In conclusion, he admitted many of his observations may not be in consonance with the “technicality”, but claimed he was constrained to record the facts as his impartiality was questioned by the government. 
Justice Rakesh Kumar had earlier served in the Patna High Court where he ordered a CBI probe into alleged corruption in the lower judiciary and created a stir alleging corruption in the High Court was an open secret. He was thereafter transferred to the Andhra Pradesh High Court in October 2019.



Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp