Remove party colours in offices or face music: Andhra Pradesh High Court on GO 623

Cancels revised Government Order, calls it contempt of court 

Published: 23rd May 2020 09:29 AM  |   Last Updated: 23rd May 2020 09:29 AM   |  A+A-

By Express News Service

VIJAYAWADA: The Andhra Pradesh High Court on Friday cancelled GO 623 issued in April by the government modifying its earlier order for painting government offices, particularly village panchayat offices, adding an additional colour brown.  

Taking serious note of the development, a division Bench of Chief Justice JK Maheswari and Justice N Jayasurya deemed it contempt of court. The Bench said it has taken up the issue suo motu and is registering a contempt of court case against the Chief Secretary, Principal Secretary (Panchayat Raj) and Panchayat Raj Commissioner.

Making it clear that adding an additional colour to the three colours, which the court in its earlier order had asked to be replaced, is not acceptable, the Bench stressed that colours representing political parties should not be painted on government offices.  “In case, the court orders are not followed and the colours not replaced by the next hearing on May 28, the three officers — Chief Secretary, Principal Secretary (Panchayat Raj) and Panchayat Raj commissioner — have to appear before the court in person,” the Bench ruled. The Supreme Court has also supported the High Court order, the Bench reminded the government counsel.

After the court had cancelled the earlier GO issued by the government to paint government offices in three colours, which represent the YSRC, the State government issued another order — GO 623. Following it, Suryadevara Venkata Rao of Angalakuduru village near Tenali in Guntur district approached the High Court, challenging the same.  

During the arguments, advocates representing the government said the four colours represent agriculture and allied sectors, but the court did not agree with the argument and observed that any political party when in power wants to have the office buildings painted in its party colours. It is not acceptable. In the earlier verdict, the same was clearly stated, but the government did not heed the directions and just added one more colour to show that it is following the order. It further observed that the Supreme Court and High Court directions were disregarded, which has to be seen as contempt of court.

The officials have time till May 28 to correct the lapse and replace the colours, if not, the three officers have to appear before the court in person, the court said. It made it clear that the petitioner is eligible for `10,000 as court expenses.

Stay up to date on all the latest Andhra Pradesh news with The New Indian Express App. Download now


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

  • Ramakrishna

    The entire cost of party colours must be borne by the Tughluk himself from his pocket. Why should the taxpayers pay for the cost of stupidity
    9 days ago reply
flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp