STOCK MARKET BSE NSE

Now, Telangana advocate writes to Chief Justice of India against AP High Court remarks on DGP

Koteswara Rao said judicial adjudication means objective consideration of proposals and rebuttals, and giving a judgment on the weight of evidence.

Published: 17th October 2020 09:33 AM  |   Last Updated: 17th October 2020 09:33 AM   |  A+A-

Chief Justice of India S A Bobde. (Photo | PTI)

By Express News Service

VIJAYAWADA: T Koteswara Rao, a practising advocate in the Telangana High Court and CAT Hyderabad, in a letter to the Chief Justice of India has requested for laying down of some restraints and checks for the judiciary in its adjudication process. 

The advocate wrote the letter to the CJI expressing concern over the comments made by the High Court of Andhra Pradesh against the Director General of Police in some cases. His letter is yet to be listed for hearing. “I hope as soon as the caseload on the apex court is lessened, it gets listed as a Public Interest Litigation,” Rao told TNIE. 

Citing news reports published in both the electronic and print media, the advocate said that a family in Andhra Pradesh had approached the High Court, by  filing Habeas Corpus petition, for the release of one of their family members, who was arrested by the police. “The court, according to reports, has observed that police have failed to implement the rule of law in the State and that the DGP should submit his resignation if he cannot control the police forces,” he said in his letter. “Though the news reports did not disclose the stage of hearing, it was definitely not at the stage of pronouncement of judgment,” he added.

Koteswara Rao said judicial adjudication means objective consideration of proposals and rebuttals, and giving a judgment on the weight of evidence. “In this instance, the High Court has chosen to arrive at a conclusion at the hearing stage of the petition and also made scathing remarks against a senior officer, who is heading the police force. Assuming that the officer is not able to control his force, it is not the solution for the High Court to seek his resignation under the law as a measure of punishment,” he said in his letter. 

The advocate observed in his letter that it became a routine process, rather a symbol of efficiency for many members of the Bench, including in Tribunals, to adjudicate the matters by conducting question and answer sessions, where counsel are required to answer the questions posed by the bench without any arguments. In the process, the matter is becoming a quasi-lis, i.e., lis between petitioner and the bench. 

“If these tendencies are allowed to prevail, much time may not be needed for the major stakeholder in the judicial process, i.e., the common man having lost his confidence would revolt against the system. This is precisely the situation in the present case. After all, the present government of AP was elected by the people of the State. Therefore, without  going into the merits of the case, I submit that time has come to lay down some restraints and checks for the judiciary to practice in its adjudication process,” Koteswara Rao said in his letter to the Chief Justice of India.



Comments(1)

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

  • Bssnraju

    Various Supreme Court rulings no judicial officers shall not make harsh comments from bench. It is sad
    8 days ago reply
IPL_2020
flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp