STOCK MARKET BSE NSE

VS pleads before court to hear his version in Ice Cream case

Opposition Leader V S Achuthanandan on Friday appeared before the Kozhikode Judicial First Class Magistrate Court I and submitted a petition seeking to hear his versions while considering the final report submitted by the SIT on the ice-cream parlour sex scandal sabotage case.

Published: 07th July 2012 08:09 AM  |   Last Updated: 07th July 2012 11:16 AM   |  A+A-

Achuthanandan_eps

Opposition Leader V S Achuthanandan on Friday appeared before the Kozhikode Judicial First Class Magistrate Court I and submitted a petition seeking to hear his versions while considering the final report submitted by the SIT on the ice-cream parlour sex scandal sabotage case.

Judicial First Class Magistrate P T Prakasan adjourned the hearing of the case to July 30.

In the petition , Achuthanandan objected the SIT’s act of submitting the final report before the Magistrate Court while the case was directly monitored by the High Court.

Achuthanandan’s advocate P Rajiv said the SIT had violated the procedure. On behalf of the government, Assistant Public Prosecutor Sreeja countered that Achuthanandan had no right to submit the petition as he was a third party in the case and requested the court to reject the petition.

After hearing both counsels, Magistrate Prakasan informed whether the petition of Achuthanandan was maintainable or not would be considered on July 30.

Report submitted

The Special Investigation Team (SIT) which probed the ice-cream parlour sex scandal sabotage case submitted its final report before the Magistrate Court on June 13 as per Section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

The case was based on allegations that Industries Minister P K Kunhalikutty and his estranged relative K A Rauf had entered into a criminal conspiracy to screen the former in the ice-cream parlour sex scandal and undermined the process of investigation and trial of the case by influencing investigating officers, witnesses and judicial officers using money and misusing power.

However, the SIT report noted that apart from the solitary deposition of Rauf, there was neither admissible and relevant evidence nor any documentary evidence to substantiate the allegations against Kunhalikutty.

However, the probe established that the witnesses of the ice-cream parlour sex scandal had received exorbitant amount of money at various points of time.

But due to varying and inconsistent nature of versions given by the witnesses, the purpose for which they received money could not be revealed.

The SIT took statements of 142 persons including Justice K Thankappan, Justice K Narayana Kurup, former government pleader P C Iype, former Kozhikode mayors O Rajagopal and T P Dasan, retired Judge L R Sathyan, former advocate general M K Damodaran, former additional advocate general V K Beeran, Works Minister V K Ebrahim Kunju and personal staff of Opposition Leader V S Achuthanandan and minister P K Kunhalikutty.



Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp