STOCK MARKET BSE NSE

Order that Paved Way for Enforcing Liquor Policy

Published: 30th December 2015 05:54 AM  |   Last Updated: 30th December 2015 05:54 AM   |  A+A-

KOCHI: Though the Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld the liquor policy of the state government,it was an order by the High Court of  Kerala that paved the way for enforcing of the liquor policy and closure of bars.

Terming the state government’s intention as a laudable effort,  Justice V Chidambaresh in April 2014 had declined to interfere in the decision not to renew the licence of 418 bars on a batch of petitions filed by  bar owners seeking a direction to maintain status quo till the legal battle is over.

The 19-month-long  legal battle between bar owners and the state government over liquor policy  began with the order passed by Justice Chidambaresh. If the High Court then had ordered to maintain the status quo, all bars in the state would have remained open till the final verdict of the Supreme Court.

The petition came up for the consideration of Justice Chidambaresh after Justice C T Ravikumar, who  first heard argument on the petitions on liquor policy, later  recused from hearing arguments. Justice C T Ravikumar rescued himself from passing orders as Advocate K Thavamony, practising in the High Court, met him at judge’s residence and attempted to discuss the issue.

Dismissing the plea by bar owners, the court  had made it clear that bar owners  had no fundamental right to carry out liquor business, and it was only a privilege. The court also  observed that it was premature for the court to issue a directive to the government to renew bar licences to hotels which did not confirm to four stars and above classification. ‘’The intention of the government was obviously to amend the rules allowing renewal for four stars and above hotels. Hence, it did not find any ground to interfere with the government decision,’’ the order said.

Though the bar owners challenged the Single Judge order before Division Bench of the High Court, the Bench comprising Justice Antony Dominic and Justice Alexander Thomas recused from hearing appeals without citing any specific reason.

New Policy

The state government framed a new liquor policy in early 2014 on the basis of  a report submitted by Justice Ramachandran Commission, which was entrusted with the task of making suggestions to revise the liquor policy.



Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp