Jisha murder case: Court dismisses convict Ameerul Islam's plea, decision on quantum of punishment adjourned till tomorrow

The Special Investigation Team probing the case had used DNA technology and verification of call record details to prove Islam's involvement in the crime.

Published: 13th December 2017 06:54 PM  |   Last Updated: 13th December 2017 08:11 PM   |  A+A-

Ameerul Islam, the lone accused in the Jisha murder case, being taken to jail after the Ernakulam Principal District and Sessions Court found him guilty in the case on Tuesday. (File | EPS)

By PTI

KOCHI: A hearing to decide the quantum of punishment to the lone convict found guilty in the rape and murder of a 30-year-old Dalit law student in Kerala last year, was held in a trial court here today.

Ernakulam Principal Sessions court judge N Anil Kumar, who yesterday found Ameerul Islam, a migrant labourer from Assam, guilty of raping the law student at nearby Perumbavoor, heard the versions of defence and prosecution in awarding the quantum of punishment in the case.

He then adjourned the hearing to tomorrow, when the quantum of judgement is expected to be pronounced.

Today, the defence counsel moved an application seeking a fair probe, arguing that Islam, who only understands his mother tongue Assamese, was not given a fair treatment by the Kerala Police which probed the case.

The court, however, rejected the application, saying that the application submitted by the accused for further investigation was not in accordance with law.

The prosecution narrated the brutal manner in which the 30-year-old law student was raped and murdered and argued that it was a rarest of the rare case.

They argued that a death sentence should be awarded to the convict, who, they said was a pervert.

The diabolic and barbaric manner in which the crime was committed on the unarmed woman was almost like that committed on Nirbhaya, victim of the gangrape and fatal assault in New Delhi in 2012, it said.

Islam's counsel said he was not guilty and that the police had framed him in the case.

Referring to various judgements by the Supreme Court and high courts, he argued there was no eyewitness to the crime and the death penalty cannot be awarded merely on the basis of circumstantial evidence.

Islam was found guilty by the court yesterday under various sections of the IPC, including 449 (house trespass in order to commit offence punishable with death), 342 (punishment for wrongful confinement), 302 (murder), 376 (rape) 376 (A) (causing death or causes the woman to be in persistent vegetative state while committing rape).

The Special Investigation Team probing the case had used DNA technology and verification of call record details to prove Islam's involvement in the crime.

The court had on December 6 completed hearing in the case and posted for today the pronouncement of the judgement.

Islam was charged with raping and murdering the woman at Perumbavoor on April 28, 2016.

He was booked under various sections of IPC and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Rules.

As many as 100 witnesses were examined during the trial, which commenced in April last.

The woman, who hailed from a poor family, was brutally assaulted using sharp-edged weapons before being murdered at her house.

Islam, who had left Perumbavoor soon after committing the crime, was arrested from Kancheepuram in neighbouring Tamil Nadu, 50 days after the gruesome incident.

More than 100 police personnel questioned over 1,500 people in the case.

Fingerprints of over 5,000 people were also examined by the SIT personnel, who went through over 20 lakh telephonic conversations before reaching the convict.



Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp