Questioning ‘efforts to connect myth with history’

A ICHR fellow has come out with a book questioning the Kerala Council for Historical Research’s (KCHR) alleged efforts to present a distorted picture of the findings in the Pattanam excavations.

Published: 05th June 2017 03:36 AM  |   Last Updated: 05th June 2017 03:36 AM   |  A+A-

Express News Service

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM: Call it an attempt to call a spade a spade. A fellow of the Indian Council for Historical Research (ICHR) has come out with a book questioning the Kerala Council for Historical Research’s (KCHR) alleged efforts to present a distorted picture of the findings in the Pattanam excavations.

Cover page of the book ‘Pattanam’

B S Harishankar’s ‘Pattanam: Constructs, Contexts and Interventions’ questions KCHR’s alleged attempts to  connect myths and history in the excavations at Pattanam near Kodungallur. The book also traces the involvement of Euro-American scholars at the site of the dig while keeping aside the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) and Indian universities.

In his book, Harishankar says how foreign scholars have never been associated with other Indian archaeological excavations.

It questions the relevance of Pattanam for them and goes on to say how the Ministry of Home Affairs cancelled the licences of 20 NGOs in Kerala - including the KCHR - under the Foreign Contribution Regulation Act 2010.

The author argues if KCHR digs any site with Euro-American collaboration, it cannot be designated a city.

“There are certain precursors to urbanism in early historic India and it is evident from archaeological remains,” Harishankar says in his book. “They include immense size, internal planning, public architecture, settlement hierarchies, enclosing walls, script, craft specialisation, long-distance trade, subsistence strategies and population growth. Has KCHR put forward any of these pieces of evidences to substantiate its claims of Pattanam being an urban site/township/port city or civilisation?”

The book also mentions how KCHR recently presented ‘a fake argument’ about Pattanam being an archaeological mound. “Numerous archaeological sites in western India have provided evidence like ramparts, which were mud embankments to prevent flood. But no such evidence has been found at Pattanam. The fake claim was to stress Pattanam was an archaeological site,” it says.

Harisankar goes on to explain how the site at Pattanam in lower Periyar has coastal alluvium with sand and clay, lacking laterite formation or thick soil. Hence, it was not preferred as an Iron Age settlement.

The book also says how monsoon rain and heavy floods over the centuries tampered with the cultural stratigraphy, making it unfit for any excavation.

Stay up to date on all the latest Kerala news with The New Indian Express App. Download now


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp