Ayappa devotee body seeks recall of SC order to reserve verdict in Sabarimala case

A five-judge constitution bench headed by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi Wednesday reserved its decision on pleas seeking reconsideration of the September 28, 2018 judgement.

Published: 07th February 2019 08:45 PM  |   Last Updated: 07th February 2019 08:45 PM   |  A+A-

Pilgrims in front of the Sabarimala Lord Ayappa temple (Photo | EPS)


NEW DELHI: National Ayyappa Devotees' Association Thursday moved the Supreme Court seeking a recall of its order which reserved verdict on pleas seeking review of an earlier judgement, allowing women of all age groups to enter the Sabarimala temple, on the ground that NADA was not allowed to advance arguments in the hearing.

A five-judge constitution bench headed by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi Wednesday reserved its decision on pleas seeking reconsideration of the September 28, 2018 judgement.

"I am seeking a recall of the yesterday's order by which the verdict was reserved on review pleas because I was not allowed to advance oral arguments," lawyer Mathews J Nedumpara, appearing for NADA, told the bench.

"You file written arguments within three days and if we are satisfied that it requires oral hearing then we will consider," said the bench, comprising the CJI and Justices Deepak Gupta and Sanjiv Khanna.

The lawyer alleged that he had raised fundamental questions of law in the petition of NADA, but the Constitution Bench did not allow him to argue.

As many as 65 petitions -- including 56 review petitions and four fresh writ petitions including that of NADA and five transfer pleas -- were filed in the apex court after its verdict sparked violent protests in Kerala.

The apex court on Wednesday told lawyers it would hear only those who are parties to review petitions and did not allow others to argue the case, the lawyer said.

The organisation has also sought video-recording of the further proceedings in the case.

"The refusal to hear the petitioners' counsel has rendered the review petition wholly redundant, nay, as an exercise in futility, which is sure to result in great injustice. The petitioners say so because the contentions which their counsel sought to urge, but was not allowed, were those which nobody had urged," the plea said.

The apex court, by a majority of 4:1 on September 28 last year, lifted the ban that prevented women and girls between the age of 10 and 50 from entering the temple in Kerala and had held that this centuries-old Hindu religious practice was illegal and unconstitutional.

Stay up to date on all the latest Kerala news with The New Indian Express App. Download now
(Get the news that matters from New Indian Express on WhatsApp. Click this link and hit 'Click to Subscribe'. Follow the instructions after that.)


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp