SC asks Kerala government to formulate separate laws for Sabarimala temple in four weeks

Court made the observation while hearing a petition that was originally filed by the Pandalam Royal Family to protect their rights. The next hearing will be in the third week of January 2020.

Published: 20th November 2019 02:47 PM  |   Last Updated: 20th November 2019 05:37 PM   |  A+A-

Sabarimala temple

The two-month-long Sabarimala temple festival officially opened for pilgrims on November 17. (Photo | Albin Mathew,EPS)

By Express News Service

NEW DELHI: With an aim of welfare of the pilgrims visiting the Sabarimala temple, the Supreme Court on Wednesday has asked the Kerala government to come up with a law exclusively for the temple’s administration.

The court made the observation while hearing a petition that was originally filed by the Pandalam Royal Family to protect their rights.

During the hearing, the bench pulled up Kerala government for not formulating a separate law despite its earlier direction and only produced draft amendments in the Travancore-Cochin Hindu Religious Institutions Act.

ALSO READ | 12-year-old girl stopped on way to Sabarimala temple, family allowed to proceed

“This is not enough. There is need for a new, exclusive law for administration of Sabarimala temple,” the bench headed by Justice N V Ramana said while giving government a deadline of four weeks to form a new law for the temple. The bench has slated the hearing in third week of January 2020.

According to the State's amendments in the Travancore-Cochin Religious Institutions Act, there is a provision of inclusion of 1/3rd quota for women in the advisory committees.

But the bench asked the government how there can be women in the panel when a 7-judge Bench is yet to examine question of essential religious practices.

ALSO READ | There is a 'de facto' stay on SC Sabarimala verdict: Kerala Law Minister A K Balan

Last week, the Supreme Court had referred the case to a 7-judge bench. The Court also said that the larger bench would go beyond the issue of Sabarimala and would consider practices of all faith.

During the hearing, one of the judges on the bench Justice Gavai remarked that as of now, the September 2018 judgement revoking prohibition on entry of women between 10 and 50 years continues to hold.

But the statement from the bench was not related to the case which the present bench was hearing as the bigger constitution bench of seven judges will decide on the entry of women.  So, the issue remains pending till the new bench is constituted and till then state government is responsible for enforcement of the order.

Stay up to date on all the latest Kerala news with The New Indian Express App. Download now
(Get the news that matters from New Indian Express on WhatsApp. Click this link and hit 'Click to Subscribe'. Follow the instructions after that.)


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp