Sister Abhaya case: Witness says police forged his sign in inquest report

While he was passing by Pius X Convent, there was a crowd inside and seeing it he also joined them.

Published: 06th September 2019 05:46 AM  |   Last Updated: 06th September 2019 05:46 AM   |  A+A-

Sister Abhaya murder case is the longest-running murder investigation in Kerala. She was found dead on March 27, 1992 in a water well in St Pius X Convent in Kottayam. Initially, the investigation team termed the murder as suicide but later the CBI took u

On March 27, 1992, Sr Abhaya, was found murdered in the well of Pius X convent in Kottayam after she allegedly witnessed illicit relationships involving priests and nuns.

By Express News Service

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM: The prosecution’s efforts to paint the current inquest report of Sister Abhaya’s death as-fabricated has got a shot in the arm as John Scaria, whom the local police had shown as a witness in its inquest report, told the CBI court his signature was forged in the report. John said he worked as an aluminium fabrication worker and came to Kottayam for work when the Abhaya episode happened. 

While he was passing by Pius X Convent, there was a crowd inside and seeing it he also joined them. He saw the body of Sr Abhaya, which was retrieved from the well. John said the police told him to sign on a paper as a witness and he obliged. When the prosecution showed the inquest report, John identified his signature as forged. The samples of John’s original signature were handed over to the court by the prosecution. 

John told the court that the police did not read out to him the contents of the paper. The prosecution’s contention was that John had signed the original report which was destroyed by the local police. Later, his signature was forged in the second report.CBI charge is that the original inquest report hinted that Abhaya was murdered. All these details were later removed when the new report was drafted in a bid to protect the accused.  

Former head constable A A Thomas had earlier told the court that the original inquest report was destroyed. “ASI Augustine had asked another cop to destroy the original report and replace it with a new one,” he had said. John’s statement gave the prosecution one more strong piece of evidence to validate their argument. Hinging on John’s educational qualification, the defence counsel during the cross-examination tried to prove his statement was false.


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp