LDF convener EP Jayarajan turns up before court in Assembly ruckus case

The case will now be considered on October 26 when the trial date will be pronounced.

Published: 26th September 2022 01:26 PM  |   Last Updated: 26th September 2022 01:26 PM   |  A+A-

LDF convenor E P Jayarajan.

LDF convenor E P Jayarajan. (File Photo)

By Express News Service

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM:  The Chief Judicial Magistrate court here on Monday read out the charge sheet against LDF convenor E P Jayarajan in the 2015 Assembly ruckus case. Jayarajan, who was directed to turn up after he skipped the court proceedings on September 14 citing health issues, denied the charges against him. The case will now be considered on October 26 when the trial date will be pronounced.

The court on September 14 had read out the charge sheet against General Education Minister V Sivankutty,  KT Jaleel MLA and former left MLAs  K Ajith, C K Sadasivan and K Kunjumuhammed in the case, which pertains to the destruction of public property and trespassing. 

The prosecution requested the court for a month's time to hand over the documents to the accused. 

After appearing before the court, Jayarajan told the media that the case was registered as part of the political agenda of the UDF. He accused the UDF of obliterating conventions of the legislative assembly and said the then Speaker had tried to mock the LDF members.

"The UDF members belittled the assembly conventions. Instead of resolving the issue, the UDF members stayed in the assembly on the eve of the budget presentation. They created a ruckus. The Speaker also acted in a way mocking the LDF members. There was an organised attack against the LDF members. The women members and Sivankutty were attacked. The UDF members were spared and cases were registered against the LDF members, which was a politically-motivated move," he said.

The case pertains to a conflict inside the Assembly on March 13, 2015, when the opposition attempted to obstruct the then Finance Minister K M Mani from presenting the annual state budget, as he was an accused in the bar bribery case. The accused were charged with destruction of public property, trespassing and causing damage, which carries a jail term of up to five years.

The charge sheet of the crime branch said public property worth Rs 2.20 lakh was destroyed during the ruckus. Earlier, the trial court had rejected the state government's plea to withdraw the case. The government appeal challenging the trial court decision was rejected by the High Court and the Supreme Court. Recently, the High Court rejected the demand of the defendants to order a stay in the trial proceedings.

India Matters


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp