STOCK MARKET BSE NSE

Nalini’s nomination valid, BJP unconvinced

The BJD nominee for Sambalpur Parliamentary constituency, Nalinikanta Pradhan, heaved a sigh of relief after his nomination was found valid after scrutiny on Saturday.

Published: 07th April 2019 03:26 AM  |   Last Updated: 07th April 2019 09:19 AM   |  A+A-

By Express News Service

SAMBALPUR: The BJD nominee for Sambalpur Parliamentary constituency, Nalinikanta Pradhan, heaved a sigh of relief after his nomination was found valid after scrutiny on Saturday. The BJP, on the other hand, alleged that Nalinikanta manipulated his documents to validate his nomination. 

On Friday, the BJP had moved the returning officer of Sambalpur Parliamentary constituency Subham Saxena seeking rejection of nomination papers of Nalinikanta for holding the post of nominee director of Odisha State Police Housing and Welfare Corporation Limited and director of Odisha Construction Corporation (OCC) Limited, which comes under office of profit. It was also alleged that Nalinikanta had left many columns in the nomination papers blank. 

The returning officer adjourned the scrutiny by a day after objection was filed against Nalinikanta. Saxena said the BJD candidate produced requisite documents and after verifying them, it was found out that Nalinikanta did not hold any office of profit.  On blank columns in the nomination papers, Saxena said the decision to hold the nomination valid has been taken after following the guidelines of the Election Commission.

Nalinikanta said he had resigned from Odisha State Police Housing and Welfare Corporation Limited and OCC Limited on February 28 this year. On the same day, he had resigned from the post of Engineer-in-Chief-cum-Secretary of Works Department. “The BJP is trying to mislead people by raising false allegations,” he added.

The BJP candidate from the Parliamentary constituency, Nitesh Ganga Deb, said the BJD had mala fide intention in seeking time for producing documents. “Nalinikanta got the opportunity to manipulate documents and surprisingly, the returning officer also ignored the blank columns,” he alleged, adding that he will move the High Court over the issue.

Nitesh’s lawyer Siddharth Prasad Dash said the returning officer admitted to the blank columns during the scrutiny but illogically held the nomination valid. It is  violation of the guidelines of the Election Commission, he pointed out.



Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp