STOCK MARKET BSE NSE

Revocation of Guru’s detention contested

The order revoking the detention of PMK MLA and Vanniyar Sangam chief ‘Kaduvetti’ J Guru by the Union Home Ministry under the National Security Act (NSA) was passed without application of mind, senior advocate KTS Tulsi, appearing for the State government, told the Madras High Court on Monday.

Published: 27th August 2013 10:01 AM  |   Last Updated: 27th August 2013 10:01 AM   |  A+A-

Guru

The order revoking the detention of PMK MLA and Vanniyar Sangam chief ‘Kaduvetti’ J Guru by the Union Home Ministry under the National Security Act (NSA) was passed without application of mind, senior advocate KTS Tulsi, appearing for the State government, told the Madras High Court on Monday.

When the habeas corpus writ petition challenging the detention of Guru under NSA for the third time came up before justice CT Selvam, Tulsi said “the Centre’s revocation order was bald and without any reason”.

Despite the lapse of 55 days since its first revocation order dated July 1 order, the Centre has not forwarded any reason to back its orders. In the absence of reasons, the State government was entitled to infer that there was no reason at all. It was arbitrary and deserved to be quashed, Tulsi contended.

However, Additional Solicitor General P Wilson said the gist of the revocation order had been conveyed to the State government. The relevant statute did not require the Centre to communicate the entire revocation order along with the full set of reasons. The Centre did apply its mind on Guru’s representation and the State government’s report before passing the order, Wilson added.

Meanwhile, the petitioner’s counsel N R Elango said the Centre and the State governments were arguing their jurisdiction and power even while the detenu was languishing in jail. Much was being discussed on the Centre’s failure to furnish reasons for revoking the detention orders, even though the Supreme Court had categorically held that timely disposal and not reasons, was most important in cases concerning personal liberty.

Hearing the arguments, the judge asked whether an individual’s fundamental right to personal liberty could be held at stake. The arguments will continue on Tuesday.



Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

IPL_2020
flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp