STOCK MARKET BSE NSE

CBI Court Censures WB Govt Official for Non-appearance

The Special Court for CBI Cases in Chennai has passed strictures against A K Singh, an officer of the West Bengal government, a prosecution witness in a criminal case registered in 2001, for not appearing before it despite repeated summons, reminders and a bailable warrant.

Published: 06th February 2014 07:25 AM  |   Last Updated: 06th February 2014 07:25 AM   |  A+A-

The Special Court for CBI Cases in Chennai has passed strictures against A K Singh, an officer of the West Bengal government, a prosecution witness in a criminal case registered in 2001, for not appearing before it despite repeated summons, reminders and a bailable warrant.

“You are a responsible officer as Assistant Government Examiner of Questioned Documents at Kolkata. You know very well what is court proceedings and the rules and regulations regarding non-appearance of witness before the court of law. You have totally ignored the witness summons and deliberately failed to appear before this court even after executing a bail bond at the time of executing a bailable warrant by the CBI Officials. This court has been very liberal in giving adjournments for your appearance as a witness. But you did not care about this court’s orders,” observed the Sessions Court for CBI Cases Relating to Banks and Financial Institutions here on Wednesday.

Therefore, left with no other option, the judge said he was issuing a notice under Sections 350 and 87 of the CrPC asking why he should not be punished and posted the matter for February 26.

The judge noted that after receipt of bailable warrant from this court, the CBI executed the same and obtained bail bond from the officer, who was released on the promise that he would appear before this Court on February 10, 2012 without fail for cross-examination. In default of which, he would be liable for prosecution and will pay a fine of `2,000, which was also acknowledged by him. He, however, failed to appear before the court on that date and the trial suffered inordinate delay, the judge bemoaned.

After going through the memo filed by the Public Prosecutor in the case, the judge said that the CBI’s contention was a reasonable one and admissible in the eye of law. There was reason to believe that the officer might abscond or would not obey the court order.

Therefore, the court, instead of issuing summons, is issuing a non-bailable warrant against him.

Stay up to date on all the latest Tamil Nadu news with The New Indian Express App. Download now

Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp