Sethu Project a Game-spoiler for State Fishermen, Says Jaya

Charging that UPA govt went ahead without getting NoC from Tamil Nadu, CM warned hasty implementation, discarding ecological impact of multi-crore venture, will ruin marine resources.

Published: 30th March 2014 07:48 AM  |   Last Updated: 30th March 2014 08:08 AM   |  A+A-


Reiterating her government’s commitment to the policy that ‘projects are implemented for the sake of the people and not vice versa’, Chief Minister J Jayalalithaa on Saturday said that the Sethusamudram Project, hastily implemented by the UPA government, would completely destroy the livelihood of fishing community, besides harming the marine environment along the Gulf of Mannar.

“Sethusamudram project will not benefit southern Tamil Nadu in any manner as it would leave the fishing community in the lurch by destroying resources. It’s because of these reasons the AIADMK government is opposing the project. However, DMK chief M Karunanidhi is adamant on implementing the same. I leave it for you to guess for whose benefit he is demanding it,” Jayalalithaa said while campaigning for AIADMK candidate from Ramanathapuram Anwar Razza.

Stating that already `830 crore had been wasted on the Sethusamudram project, the AIADMK general secretary said though the project would connect the western and eastern seashores of India, it would not benefit the Tamil Nadu economy in any manner.

Referring to Karunanidhi’s charge that she had initially supported the scheme, she said, “Indeed I supported it and ordered the preparation of a project report in 1994. The Pallavan Transport Consultancy Services filed the report in 1996.  Many organisations, including NEERI, studied the project and found that the canal could be dug only for a depth of 12 metres.”

The UPA government, in 2004, had sought no objection certificate from the Tamil Nadu government. However, the report of an expert committee, formed by Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board, had cautioned that extensive studies should be undertaken before commencing the project. Besides, the committee had pointed out that there were several lacunae in the NEERI report on the environmental impact of the project. 

An expert committee, headed by RK Pachauri, had recommended that the project was not feasible based on the economic and environmental reasons, but the Centre ignored the report and told the Supreme Court that the project should be implemented.

Jayalalithaa said that many marine species of plants and breeding ground of fishes had been destroyed in the bridging work. “The committee had warned that the impact of drilling in the area should be taken into account. However, the project was commenced in a hasty manner, without getting the NoC from the State,” she said.

Further, the depth suggested by the panel was shallow, making it difficult for big ships to pass through. Even then, passage of a ship could reduce the depth of canal due to sand erosion, which meant that continuous drilling work needed to be undertaken in the area.

Stay up to date on all the latest Tamil Nadu news with The New Indian Express App. Download now


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp