Activists Sore as SC Norms Reduce Ambit of Rights Body

NHRC can’t intervene in encounter cases unless there is serious doubt over fair probe

Published: 25th September 2014 06:02 AM  |   Last Updated: 25th September 2014 06:02 AM   |  A+A-

CHENNAI: The detailed, 16-point guideline issued by the Supreme Court on ‘encounter’ cases has sparked a debate among activists in Tamil Nadu, who have charged that the guideline has rendered the National Human Rights Commission toothless.

“The involvement of NHRC is not necessary unless there is serious doubt about independent and impartial investigation,” reads one of the guidelines. This, say activists, appears to be in contravention to the statute on which the NHRC was formed by the Executive.

According to senior advocate and former special public prosecutor on human rights cases at Madras High Court, V Kannadasan, the Judiciary was well aware of the limited power that the NHRC has in handling such a case. This, he said, could be one of the reasons behind framing such a point in the guidelines.

Welcoming the guidelines in general, Kannadasan said the FIR relating to an encounter killing should be pursued by specialised agency that is autonomous, like the Lok Ayukta, as there is a risk that the police official investigating the case could come under pressure or influence to act in favour of a fellow official. “On the other hand, if the case is handled by an autonomous organisation, we can expect better investigation without bias,” he pointed out.

“That agency should be functioning under NHRC or the State Human Rights Commission (SHRC),” Kannadasan added, even as he admitted that not a single criminal case was recommended by the SHRC thus far in the State.

Another rights advocate, V Elango said that as each encounter is situation-specific, the term ‘encounter’ used by field level officers should be ignored. “The Supreme Court shouldn’t have acknowledged the term and frame guidelines for the same. It is as if a set of rules had been provided and satisfying the same would enable any police official to stage an encounter and get away with it,” Elango said.

The apex court’s position that the involvement of the rights body was not necessary was “unwarranted”, charged Elango. “It is an excess from Judiciary on the Executive. NHRC is a statutory body functioning under its statutes. How can they control NHRC?,” he wondered.

Stay up to date on all the latest Tamil Nadu news with The New Indian Express App. Download now
(Get the news that matters from New Indian Express on WhatsApp. Click this link and hit 'Click to Subscribe'. Follow the instructions after that.)


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp