Madras HC Comes to Rescue of Man Who Could Not Get Promotion to IAS

Published: 26th January 2016 05:18 PM  |   Last Updated: 26th January 2016 05:18 PM   |  A+A-


MADURAI: Coming to the aid of an officer who could not get promotion to IAS despite 33 years of service, Madras High Court has directed the Tamil Nadu government to recommend his name for upgradation within four months and for the Centre to pass appropriate orders in eight weeks.     

Justices V Ramasubramanian and N Kirubakaran were hearing a petition from D Pandian, who contended he could get promoted to Indian Administrative Service despite 33 years of service. They said he had committed a mistake by seeking wrong relief before judicial forums and arguing cases in person. It was not good that a person fighting for justice should lose on mere technicalities, the Judges said and directed the state government to recommend his name for promotion in four months and for the Centre to pass appropriate orders within eight weeks thereafter.      

Pandian submitted that he got employed as Junior Employment Officer in March 1982 and served in various capacities till December 1989. Then he passed Group I service exams and was appointed as Divisional Development Officer in the Rural Development Department. When he was eligible for promotion to the post of Joint Director of Rural Development,a charge memo was issued to him that year, seeking an explanation for initiating disciplinary action against a typist "without sufficient cause."      

He was imposed with a punishment of censure in March 2000 after enquiry.  The judges said if Pandian was prudent,he would have left the matter at that and gained promotions. Unfortunately he filed a petition for review, leading to problems. Pandian said the state Government ordered a re-enquiry in 2003 after citing some procedural irregularities in the enquiry conducted.They made it clear this should commence from the stage of furnishing all copies of documents relied upon in support of the charges. But the Rural Development Commissioner 'misunderstood' it and issued a fresh charge memo in 2009.       

Pandian did not challenge the validity of the 'illegal' second charge memo before the High Court. He moved the Central Administrative Tribunal challenging promotions given to juniors without asking to consider his name for promotion. CAT dismissed his case in 2013, leading to the present writ petition. The court said Pandian was completely misguided and had spoilt his case by preparing petitions and appearing in person.      They said the Tribunal could have seen the obvious injustice done to the petitioner and moulded the relief.There were no serious charges against him.      

"The manner in which he had conducted his own cases disclosed the level of frustration that he has reached. His frustration was understandable," the court observed.   

Stay up to date on all the latest Tamil Nadu news with The New Indian Express App. Download now


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp