Interim relief for 59 fresh PG students at SRM Med College

While admission of the candidates will be subject to the outcome of the writ petition, the seats of two candidates will remain vacant

Published: 15th April 2017 01:40 AM  |   Last Updated: 15th April 2017 05:08 AM   |  A+A-

Express News Service

CHENNAI: A division bench of the Madras High Court has directed the authorities concerned not to disturb the admission of 59 students made to the PG courses in SRM Medical College Hospital and Research Centre in Kattankulathur, until further orders.
The bench of Justices S Nagamuthu and Justice Anita Sumanth gave the directive while passing interim orders on a PIL from the deemed to be university, seeking to protect the interest of 61 students, who were admitted in the post-graduate programmes on April 12.

The bench, however, said that the admission of these 59 candidates shall be subject to the outcome of the writ petition. The seats of the two candidates will remain as vacant ones as they had not been admitted through the proper channel, the bench said. It also directed the State Health Department and the Director of Medical Education not to allot the 59 seats to any other candidate as they had already been filled by the petitioner university.

According to advocate B Saraswathi, on the basis of a communication issued by the National Board of Examinations for National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (NEET) for admission to MD/MS/PG diploma courses, 2017 during September 2016, the university had made the admissions of 59 students. Another two candidates were admitted from the open market. The admissions were made purely on the marks secured by them in the NEET. The admissions were completed on March 3 itself.

It is only after the selections were completed, the Union Ministry of Health & Family Welfare issued a communication on March 10 directing all deemed-to-be universities to be part of the common counselling for admission in PG courses. It added that the session will commence from May 1 and the last date of admission is May 31. While so, the Medical Council of India amended the PG Medical Education Regulations, 2000, on March 10 and inserted Regulation 9A relating to common counselling and it was published in the gazette on March 11. As per the communication, all institutions have to surrender 50pc of seats to the government quota.

Petitioner’s senior counsel V T Gopalan contended that no retrospective effect can be given to this notification. It cannot affect the admissions already made by the petitioner university prior to the date of the said notification. Deemed-to-be universities are exempted from such seat- sharing arrangement. Even otherwise, as per the decisions of the Supreme Court in TMA Pai Foundation and PA Inamdar cases, the seat-sharing arrangement should be voluntary and cannot be enforced. The amendment was unconstitutional and violative of Art. 19(1)(g) of the constitution and contrary to the foundation of autonomy of the private institutions, he added and sought to declare the same as unconstitutional.


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp