‘Why not CBI probe into gutka scam?’ 

Why a CBI probe can’t be ordered into the alleged gutka scam, wondered the first bench of the Madras High Court on Monday.

Published: 01st August 2017 07:59 AM  |   Last Updated: 01st August 2017 07:59 AM   |  A+A-

Madras High Court building | (File | Express Photo Service)

By Express News Service

CHENNAI: Why a CBI probe can’t be ordered into the alleged gutka scam, wondered the first bench of the Madras High Court on Monday. Expressing its serious concern over the issue, the bench of Chief Justice Indira Banerjee and Justice M Sundar made the observation when a PIL from DMK MLA J Anbazhagan came up for hearing on Monday.The alleged involvement of a State minister and a top police officer in the rank of DGP in the scam is serious in nature, the bench added.

It adjourned the matter to September 11 with a direction to the authorities concerned to file their reply.
In his  PIL, the DMK MLA sought to constitute a Special Investigation Team (SIT), headed by a retired judge of the High Court with the officials drawn from the CBI and other departments, to take all steps to seize and eradicate the banned items, more particularly gutka and pan masala containing tobacco and/or nicotine as per a gazette notification dated May 23, 2015 of the Commissioner of Food Safety and Drug Administration and in consonance with the directions of the Supreme Court including registering his complaint dated July 11 last and investigate the involvement of State and Central government officials and public servants in the scam.

Petitioner’s senior counsel P Wilson submitted that on seeing that the banned items - gutka and pan masala - containing tobacco and/or nicotine are sold in Tamil Nadu and particularly in Chennai freely, MK Stalin, Leader of the Opposition in the Assembly, produced evidence and photographs on July 19. 
Since a minister of the State and high-level State and Central government officers including high level police officials are involved in this scam, no free, fair or impartial investigation can be conducted by the State Police. 

Only the CBI can conduct a thorough and impartial investigation into this issue, Wilson contended.
“This is a classic case of fence grazing the crop. The person who was named by the IT department as the person who received the bribe was now conferred with the top post of DGP. Hence, no fair and impartial investigation can be expected from the State police,” petitioner’s senior counsel added.

Stay up to date on all the latest Tamil Nadu news with The New Indian Express App. Download now


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp