Criminal proceedings against two quashed

Holding that Section 509 of the Indian Penal Code was invoked intentionally to file a complaint attracting a cognisable offence against a man and his father to harass them, the Madras High Court has s

Published: 02nd December 2017 01:51 AM  |   Last Updated: 02nd December 2017 08:19 AM   |  A+A-

By Express News Service

CHENNAI: Holding that Section 509 of the Indian Penal Code was invoked intentionally to file a complaint attracting a cognisable offence against a man and his father to harass them, the Madras High Court has set aside the criminal and defamation proceedings pending against them before a lower court in Tirupur.

According to counsel S Sathya Narayanan, a woman engaged in apparel business lodged a complaint with Tirupur North police alleging that Arun had posted defamatory statements against her firm in the internet due to enmity. Police registered a case for offences under various provisions of the IT Act read with Sections 500 (Punishment for defamation) & 509 (Word, gesture and act intended to insult the modesty of a woman) against the son and for an offence under Section 506 (1) (Punishment for criminal intimidation) IPC against the father.

Sathya contended that the offences under Sections 500 and 509 had not been made out against Arun. Section 509 had been included falsely only for making out a cognisable offence. As regards defamation, he said that only a private complaint would lie against him. The offence against the father - 506 (1) was a non-cognisable one, he said and hence, the entire proceedings are liable to be quashed, he said.
Justice Ramesh pointed out that the cause of action arose from the message posted in the internet by Arun.

It was clear and explicit to defame the complainant and her firm. But, none of the words or phrases in the same message amounted to insulting her modesty. As such the offence of Section 509 IPC could not be made out against Arun. The complaint contained no allegation to attract provisions of the IT Act, too, the judge said.

Action of court

Justice M S Ramesh quashed the proceedings while allowing a petition from R Arun and his father P Ramaswamy, against the proceedings pending before the Judicial Magistrate-I in Tirupur, on November 14 last

Stay up to date on all the latest Tamil Nadu news with The New Indian Express App. Download now
(Get the news that matters from New Indian Express on WhatsApp. Click this link and hit 'Click to Subscribe'. Follow the instructions after that.)

Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp