Aircel-Maxis case: Supreme Court to hear Karti's plea for quashing CBI, ED summons in January

Alleging that Central government was "misusing" its agencies to harass him, Karti Chidambaram had sought the quashing of the order of provisional attachment.

Published: 08th December 2017 10:43 PM  |   Last Updated: 08th December 2017 10:43 PM   |  A+A-

Karti Chidambaram


NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Friday said it will hear in January a plea by Karti Chidambaram, son of former Finance Minister P Chidambaram, seeking the quashing of CBI and ED summons in the Aircel-Maxis case.

Alleging that Central government was "misusing" its agencies to harass him, Karti Chidambaram had sought the quashing of the order of provisional attachment.

A bench of Chief Justice Dipak Misra, Justice A.M. Khanwilkar and Justice D.Y. Chandrachud said the plea will be heard in January next year and the copy of the petition was served on Additional Solicitor General Tushar Mehta for response by the Central government.

Questioning the issuance of the summons by the Central Bureau of Investigation and the Enforcement Directorate, Karti Chidambaram said nothing has been found about his alleged role in the grant of Foreign Investment Promotion Board approval to Global Communication Services Holdings Ltd, a subsidiary of Maxis, for investing in Aircel when his father was Finance Minister. 

The case is also part of the 2G spectrum scam.

By its February 2 order, the Special court, trying 2G cases, had discharged the Maran brothers - Dayanidhi and Kalanithi - in the case, holding that that there was no prima facie case warranting the framing of charges, he has said.

Referring to the two reports of February 20, 2013 and September 9, 2014 submitted to the Supreme Court in sealed cover by the CBI, Karti Chidambram says the reports, on the CBI's investigation into alleged wrongdoing in FIPB approval in the Aircel-Maxis matter, after being perused by the top court, were directed to be kept back in the sealed cover.

He said that had there been any indication of illegality or irregularity in the matter, the top court would have ordered action, but nothing of the sort happened.

"It can be reasonably inferred that the reports did not disclose any illegality or irregularity in the grant of FIPB approval" by the Finance Ministry when P. Chidambaram was the Finance Minister in UPA government.

Meanwhile, special public prosecutor in 2G cases, senior counsel Anand Grover, sought clarification on his appearance in the matter, saying he has been asked to stay away as it was not a 2G case.

He told the bench that he was appointed Special Public Prosecutor for 2G cases by the top court and sought its clarification.

Stay up to date on all the latest Tamil Nadu news with The New Indian Express App. Download now
(Get the news that matters from New Indian Express on WhatsApp. Click this link and hit 'Click to Subscribe'. Follow the instructions after that.)


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp