STOCK MARKET BSE NSE

325 liquor shops identified in prohibited area, TASMAC to Madras HC

TASMAC had in September last year submitted that there were 900 such shops.    

Published: 04th March 2017 05:46 PM  |   Last Updated: 04th March 2017 05:46 PM   |  A+A-

Madras High Court (File|PTI)

By PTI

CHENNAI: The state-run Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation (TASMAC) has informed the Madras High Court that 325 retail liquor vending shops in the state have been identified as being located within a prohibited area.      

TASMAC had in September last year submitted that there were 900 such shops.    

 In the affidavit filed by TASMAC, it was mentioned that there were 6,200 retail liquor vending shops in the state, which have been identified and measurements have been carried out as per the Tamil Nadu Survey and Boundaries Act.      

However, it recently submitted that 325 shops have been identified, which may be in violation of Rule 8 of the Tamil Nadu Liquor Retail Vending (in Shops and Bars) Rules.      

The matter relates to a PIL filed by social activist A Narayanan to declare Rule 8 (1) of the Tamil Nadu Liquor Retail Vending (in Shops and Bars) Rules as unconstitutional.      

As per the PIL, the rule lays down that "No shop shall be established in Municipal Corporations and Municipalities within a distance of 50 metres and in other areas 100 metres from any place of worship or educational institutions" and adds that "provided that the distance restriction shall not apply in areas designated as "Commercial or Industrial" by the Development and Town Planning Authorities."      

In the recent counter affidavit TASMAC submitted that pursuant to the orders Court, all District Collectors were requested to constitute survey teams headed by Inspector of survey to measure the distance between the Retail vending shop and the nearest educational institution/place of worship as per Tamil Nadu Survey and Boundaries Rules, 1925.      

The State Government had also ordered closure of 500 vending shop on Februuary 20, the affidavit submitted.      

The First bench comprising Acting Chief Justice Huluvadi G Ramesh and Justice R Mahadevan posted the matter for further hearing after a month on the request of the Government seeking one more month's time to comply the couly order. 



Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp