STOCK MARKET BSE NSE

Retired bank staff gets relief as probe restrained in certificate validity case

Coming to the rescue of a retired bank employee, the Madras High Court has restrained DSP, SC/ST Vigilance Cell, from holding an enquiry to ascertain the genuineness of the community certificate produ

Published: 26th November 2017 07:43 AM  |   Last Updated: 26th November 2017 10:13 AM   |  A+A-

Madras High Court. (File photo)

By Express News Service

CHENNAI: Coming to the rescue of a retired bank employee, the Madras High Court has restrained DSP, SC/ST Vigilance Cell, from holding an enquiry to ascertain the genuineness of the community certificate produced by him, five years after retirement.

A division bench of Justices C T Selvam and M V Muralidharan granted the injunction while passing interim orders on a petition from A Jayaraman of Sundapalayam in Coimbatore on November 23 last. The bench also issued notice to the authorities concerned, returnable in two weeks.

According to advocate Yogesh Kannadasan, Jayaraman was appointed as a probationary officer in State Bank of India under ST quota in 1980. He retired as manager of Ambattur Industrial Estate branch in February 2012 and the retirement benefits were settled. He was drawing pension. During service, his employer, by a circular dated January 13, 1998, had called upon various ST employees to produce another community certificate authenticated by the respective District Collectors. The ST Employees Welfare Association moved the Madras High Court, which in July 2005 had quashed the circular.

While so, by a letter dated May 23 last, the DSP, SC/ST Vigilance Cell, informed Jayaraman to appear before the cell on June 9 last. By a letter dated June 10, the petitioner asked for a copy of a communication dated February 14, 2017, based on which the letter was issued, to defend his case effectively. However, the DSP, without acceding the request, told him to appear before him on June 12.

Yogesh wondered under what authority the enquiry was to be commenced, in the absence of any adverse material to show to the contrary. It could not be done so after a lapse of five years from the date of his retirement, that too after the High Court quashing a similar circular, Yogesh contended and sought to quash the June 9 communication.



Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp