STOCK MARKET BSE NSE

No stay on disqualification of 18 AIADMK MLAs, no floor test for now: Madras High Court

Madras HC extended the stay order on floor test in Tamil Nadu assembly until further order. It also adjourned the case on the MLAs disqualification to October 4.

Published: 20th September 2017 12:46 PM  |   Last Updated: 20th September 2017 04:30 PM   |  A+A-

T T V Dhinakaran addressing the press. (File | EPS)

By Express News Service

CHENNAI: Justice M Duraiswamy of the Madras High Court extended the operation of his earlier order, which stayed the conduct of a floor test to the Tamil Nadu State Legislative Assembly. The judge also restrained the Election Commission of India from issuing election notification to the 18 constituencies, which had been declared vacant on September 19, pursuant to the disqualification of the rebel MLAs on September 18.

The judge was passing interim orders on the writ petitions filed by the 18 disqualified MLAs challenging the order of Speaker P Dhanapal on September 18.

The interim order was passed based on consent given by both parties — the speaker and the petitioner MLAs.  Earlier, senior counsel Dushyant Dave, representing the 18 MLAs told the judge that no MLA had defected from the AIADMK to switch over any other political party. So the penal action against them under the Anti-defection law is unwarranted. The Speaker had totally ignored the ruling of the Supreme Court in BS Yeddyurappa case.  The MLAs had been unlawfully stripped of their posts only to enable the Edappadi K Palaniswami government to get through the confidence motion, he said, adding that the MLAs had given a representation to the State Governor expressing lack of confidence only in the chief minister and not in the government.

The MLAs in question neither voluntarily gave up their posts nor denied the whip, but yet they were disqualified because the Speaker failed to try and ascertain the truth. “The Speaker is not above law, and he too is bound to act within the Constitution,” he said. The Speaker, in this case, had acted like a political person and all his actions are under the scrutiny of the court under Article 226 of the Constitution, Dave said adding that “people sitting in Delhi are deciding the affairs of Tamil Nadu”.

Speaker’s senior counsel Aryama Sundaram said it would not be fair to drag the Centre into the controversy.

Recording the submissions, the court passed the interim order and posted the pleas to October 4 for further hearing. 



Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

IPL_2020
flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp