Centre refutes TN charges, says DPR nod for Mekedatu dam conditional

Centre said any further approval would be subject to Karnataka resolving inter-state matters amicably with co-Basin States of Cauvery basin. 

Published: 13th January 2019 01:27 AM  |   Last Updated: 13th January 2019 05:56 AM   |  A+A-

Mekedatu dam

Water from Gaganachukki falls flows towards Mekedatu reservoir

Express News Service

CHENNAI: The Union government on Saturday refuted Tamil Nadu government’s charges on Mekedatu dam and said the clearance given to Karnataka to prepare Detailed Project Report (DPR) was conditional and any further approval would be subject to Karnataka resolving inter-state matters amicably with co-Basin States of Cauvery basin. 

Filing an affidavit before the SC, under secretary to Ministry of Water Resources Ananda Chandra said conditional clearance was only for preparation of DPR and in no way does it convey the Central government or Central Water Commission (CWC) clearance for construction. 

Administrative Secretary in-charge of Water Resource Department of all co-basin states including TN was a member of Cauvery Water Management Authority. The DPR after its preparation will come before CWMA and only after acceptance of DPR by CWMA, it will be brought before the Advisory Committee of the ministry. The official said technical parameters are not finalised and fixed at this stage. 

“The DPR will be examined in specialised directorates of CWC including Inter-State Matters Directorate, if found acceptable will be submitted to Advisory Committee of Irrigation and Multipurpose Projects of Ministry of Water Resources for acceptance.” 

ON the basis of the note prepared by CWC and deliberations during the meeting of Advisory Committee, decision on acceptance of the projects will be taken. “As far as Mekedatu project was concerned, the conditional clearance for preparation of DPR was subject to project authority (Karnataka) resolving inter-state matters amicably by due consultation with co-Basin States of Cauvery basin,” Ananda Chandra said and added that TN’s grounds in the miscellaneous application before the Supreme Court were misleading and filed upon the basis of deliberately false and distorted averments and requested the court to dismiss it with exemplary cost.


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

  • Raj

    Isn't that Supreme Court verdict indicated no further dams on Cauvery without TN asset. In that case isn't that rational for Central Government to consult TN before giving permission for DPR to Karnataka.
    2 years ago reply
flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp