STOCK MARKET BSE NSE

M Karunanidhi too suggested quota for poor, but for all castes

But 40 years ago, the late DMK president, M Karunanidhi, suggested an inclusive reservation formula to benefit not only the poor among the forward communities but also the poor among all communities.

Published: 15th January 2019 05:31 AM  |   Last Updated: 15th January 2019 05:31 AM   |  A+A-

Kalaignar M Karunanidhi

Kalaignar M Karunanidhi (File | EPS)

Express News Service

CHENNAI: Just as the NDA government has amended the Constitution to provide 10 per cent reservation for the economically backward among forward communities, there are arguments still going on in support and opposition.

But 40 years ago, the late DMK president, M Karunanidhi, suggested an inclusive reservation formula to benefit not only the poor among the forward communities but also the poor among all communities. The DMK’s general council in July 1979 passed a resolution in the regard.  But the suggestion did not see the light. 

After issuing the controversial G.O. No.1159 dated July 2, 1979, fixing an annual income ceiling of Rs 9,000 for the Backward Classes (BCs) for availing reservation, the then Chief Minister M G Ramachandran (MGR) announced that from 1980-81, a certain percentage of reservation would be apportioned for the poor among forward communities.

Terming this as a dangerous move, Karunanidhi suggested a way out for resolving the issue.  He said 15 to 20 per cent reservation could be provided to the poor among all castes through the open quota of 51 per cent where people from all communities including Brahmins, Mudaliyar, Chettiyar and Pillaimar can avail the benefit.  

Karunanidhi said, “If the government accepts our demands, there will be no need for agitation against the AIADMK government.” But after MGR withdrew the economic criterion G.O. following his party’s rout in the 1980 Lok Sabha elections, the demand died down. 

Asked whether such an ‘inclusive reservation formula’ suggested by Karunanidhi is possible now, Dravidar Kazhagam president K Veeramani explains, “Since the SC had clarified that any reservation on the basis of economic criterion is unconstitutional, Kalaignar (M Karunanidhi) did not press for that after MGR withdrew the controversial G.O. fixing income ceiling for BCs to get reservation.  Such a proposition would not suit the present situation because defining the economically weaker sections will be impossible. In cases relating to the Mandal Commission recommendations, the SC had categorically said economic criterion should not be applied for providing reservation and apportioning a percentage from the open quota for the poor belonging to all communities became impossible.”  

Historian K Thirunavukkarasu says: “The SC has clearly set out that the reservation can be provided only on the basis of the socially and educationally backward classes alone.  Kalaignar had proposed such an idea with a view to stalling the controversial G.O. issued by MGR. Now, the situation has changed much.  Besides, the open quota is opened to all communities and culling out a percentage from it will affect all those who compete under the open quota.” 

Political analyst Tharasu Shyam says, “The reservation for BCs, MBCs, and SC/STs, has gone up to 69 per cent now, which is much more than what was there during MGR regime.  So, apportioning a further 15 to 20 per cent for the poor among general category is not possible in Tamil Nadu and such a proposal is irrelevant now.”



Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

edexworks
flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp