Atheists have right to their opinion: Madras High Court

HC dismisses PIL alleging atheistic messages ascribed to Periyar actually are of K Veeramani

Published: 06th September 2019 05:06 AM  |   Last Updated: 06th September 2019 05:06 AM   |  A+A-

Madras High Court

Madras High Court (File Photo | D Sampath Kumar)

Express News Service

CHENNAI: A division bench of the Madras High Court has refused to remove the inscriptions — there is no God, the inventors and preachers are fools and rogues and those who worship God are barbarians — at the pedestals of Periyar statues across the State.

Periyar believed in what he said and there is nothing wrong in having his views inscribed on the statues, a bench of Justices S Manikumar and Subramonium Prasad said and added they have no hesitation to conclude that the writing and speeches of Periyar cannot be curtailed. There is nothing wrong in “one expressing his views on religion and the existence of God”, the bench said.

The bench was dismissing a PIL filed by M Deivanayagam, praying for a directive to the State Chief Secretary to remove the “offensive” words at the bottom of Periyar’s statues. He contended that Periyar had always advocated self-respect and not atheism and this was ascertainable through his words and deeds.

When Periyar was alive, on September 17, 1967, his statue was unveiled at Tiruchi bus-stand by the then Chief Minister CN Annadurai, in the presence of Kundrakudi Adigalar and Kamarajar.

The same does not contain any principle of atheism. After the demise of Periyar on December 18, 1973, the DK party headed by K Veeramani started propagating atheism as the principle of Periyar and it has started to create statues having inscriptions — there is no God, God doesn’t exist. Periyar had not uttered such words during his lifetime. He had never uttered the words, inscribed below the statue, it was Veeramani, who made the inscriptions, petitioner contended.

In their 68-page order, the bench said from the speeches and expressions of Periyar from 1928, one can clearly conclude that it was Periyar’s philosophy and ideology, which became the self-respect movement, and later on, a party.

The contention of the petitioner that everything was done by Veeramani only after the demise of Periyar, was contrary to the facts and cannot be accepted. Periyar’s propagation of the philosophy of self-respect, social reform, ending caste system, equal rights and to establish a society of brotherhood could never be found fault with. According to Periyar, belief in God was the sole reason for inequalities, the judges said.
A reading of the material enclosed in the typed set of papers reflect Periyar’s thought and expression on God, religion, caste and such other issues. He was known for atheism. The speeches and writings of Periyar are explicit.

Going through the entire material on record, the bench said Veeramani had every right under the Constitution to fight for social justice in eradicating inequality, right for upliftment of women and downtrodden people, express views on religion and existence of God, the bench said.


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

  • Brien

    Of course ... makes sense The religious people are the ones who have not and cannot prove their claims of their gods....
    1 year ago reply
flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp