Telangana Justifies Cabinet Rank to Advisors

The govt says the aim is to provide effective administration

Published: 04th October 2015 05:48 AM  |   Last Updated: 04th October 2015 05:56 AM   |  A+A-

HYDERABAD: The Telangana government has defended its action before the Hyderabad High Court contending that it has discretionary powers to accord ‘Cabinet rank’ to the persons who were appointed as advisors, special representatives of the government and others.

In this regard, the government represented by its chief secretary has filed a counter affidavit pursuant to a direction by a division bench of the Court which was dealing with a PIL case filed by Congress MP Gutha Sukhender Reddy challenging the state’s action in ‘indiscriminately’ conferring cabinet rank status to its political appointees.

The petitioner MP contended that Article 164 (1A) of the Constitution has imposed a ceiling of 15 percent of the ministers who enjoy the status of cabinet rank, on the total strength of the members of the legislative assembly. He said that conferment of cabinet rank on persons who are not ministers would amount to a flagrant violation of Article 164 (1A) and hence it is liable to be declared as unconstitutional.

The government, in its counter affidavit, informed the court that conferring the Cabinet ranks is an usual practices adopted by various governments and the erstwhile AP government had also accorded Cabinet rank status to its advisors. The aim of the government in according Cabinet status to other than Ministers was that to provide a better and effective administration to the people, it added.

It also informed the court that the appointees who were conferred Cabinet rank are experts in their respective fields and as they were neither appointed under Article 164 of the Constitution nor they are part of the Cabinet and they were also not performed oath in accordance with Article 164 (1A) of the Constitution.

The government submitted that the Cabinet ranks were accorded to give salaries and perks to the advisors and others, and urged the court to dismiss the PIL as the petitioner being a Congress leader has been intervening in many of the decisions without their being valid reasons. The present case is also one among the other petitions filed by the petitioner with a political motive, it pointed out.

Advisors to the state government R Vidyasagar Rao, AK Goel, A Ramalakshman, BV Papa Rao, KV Ramanachary, GR Reddy, special representatives to the state at New Delhi S Venugopalachary, Ramachandrudu Tejavath, KM Sahni, chairman of the Telangana Tourism Corporation Limited Pervaram Ramulu, chairman of Telangana Scheduled Castes Co-operative Development Corporation Limited Pidamarthi Ravi, vice-chairman of Telangana State Planning Board Singireddy Niranjan Reddy, chairman of Telangana Samskruthika Sarathi Erpula Balakishan and chairman of Telangana State Press Academy Allam Narayana were among the persons mentioned by the petitioner who were conferred with the cabinet rank.


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp