Justify Charge against Srini,HC Tells CBI

Published: 30th October 2015 05:06 AM  |   Last Updated: 30th October 2015 05:06 AM   |  A+A-

HYDERABAD: The Hyderabad High Court on Thursday asked the CBI to justify its charge against India Cements in the YS Jaganmohan Reddy’s disproportionate assets case, citing former irrigation minister Ponnala Lakshmaiah’s statement in the Supreme Court that no illegality was involved in allocation of water to the former BCCI president N Srinivasan’s company.

Justice B Siva Sankara Rao was dealing with a petition filed by India Cements managing director N Srinivasan urging the court to quash the case registered against him. The CBI has charged him with entering into a conspiracy with the then YS Rajasekhara Reddy regime and getting several land and water allotments to his company. In return, he invested about `140 crore in Jagan’s companies, the CBI alleged.

During the hearing, the judge asked the CBI counsel P Kesava Rao, “You (CBI) say that the water allotment from Kagna river in Tandur of Ranga Reddy district to Visakha Cements of Srinivasan was wrong. But the then irrigation minister (Ponnala Lakshmaiah) who oversaw this water allotment argued before the Supreme Court that water gets evaporated if not allocated on time and that there was no illegality in the matter. How do you explain or defend your action in this regard?”

Further, the judge posed questions on alleged bribes or investments in the case. “The so-called bribes or investments have been coming into Jagan firms from the end of 2006 onwards and what is the correlation between the investments and the movement of India Cements files at the AP secretariat? How would it (CBI) make Srinivasan responsible for the action of his company which deals with several persons as part of its business?,” the judge asked.

The CBI counsel earlier narrated the sequence of events that took place between Srinivasan’s company’s investments in Jagan firms and the file movement pertaining to the benefits that were given to India Cements by the erstwhile united AP state.While posting the matter to Nov 2 for further hearing, the judge extended the exemption from personal appearance given to Srinivasan till then.


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp