PMO’s peace disease paralyses foreign policy

After the Chinese occupation of parts of Depsang valley on 15 April followed by Sarabjit Singh’s murder in Pakistan, questions are being raised on who is running Indian foreign policy.

Published: 05th May 2013 07:54 AM  |   Last Updated: 05th May 2013 10:20 AM   |  A+A-

Foreign policy is a battle of perception and India is on a losing streak, scaring the  ruling Congress that faces elections in 2014. After the Chinese occupation of parts of Depsang valley on 15 April followed by Sarabjit Singh’s murder in Pakistan, questions are being raised on who is running Indian foreign policy.

Is it the Prime Minister, with his conciliatory attitude towards India’s belligerent neighbours? According to reports, Sarabjit’s release was not even on the agenda of talks between Manmohan Singh and Pakistan President Asif Zardari last April, though Chishty, an ailing Pakistani scientist was released by India on humanitarian grounds. Zardari had campaigned for his release while India kept mum on Sarabjit. Does the helpless Indian Foreign Minister Salman Khurshid—whose China visit slated for 9 May is being met with China’s apparent indifference—have a say in formulating Indian foreign policy? Is it India’s ineffective foreign secretary Ranjan  Mathai, who retires in June and is not allowed to take decisions within his own ministry like appointing key envoys who takes the call on India’s international stance? Or is it the National Security Advisor Shivshankar Menon, the advocate of a soft policy towards China and other neighbours who decides Indian foreign policy? Defence Minister A K Antnoy—known as St Antony for his peacenik image—toed the PMO line on the intrusion by advocating diplomatic resolution. However, the Army and Foreign Ministry were at loggerheads. Sources claimed the army had told the China Study Group that, “the first 48 hours after the intrusion was detected were crucial”. It would have been “easier to evict the Chinese then, but there was no green light”. But the South Block repeated a single chant—the army should stand down and there should be no confrontation at the border.

DITHER AND SLITHER: The NSA-led Ministry of External Affairs is hawking peace even as Chinese soldiers are sitting within Indian orders and Indian soldiers were beheaded on the LoC. Manmohan Singh, desperately but ineffectually trying to save his image is abstaining from opening any other front. The US pressure to maintain military stability in the region has weakened a pliant India, which has been told to refrain from military action against an election-bound Pakistan. Even symbolic actions like suspending group visas and restricting business visits of Pakistani citizens are not being done in order to prevent Manmohan’s ill-fated peace process from failing. On Wednesday, the army chief briefed the Cabinet Committee on Security (CCS) and given various options to remove the Chinese, including the use of military aggression. But he was vetoed.


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp