Nirmohi Akhara

AIMPLB colluding with Nirmohi Akhara, VHP on Ayodhya verdict: Ittehad-e-Millat Council

He condemned Hyderabad MP Asaduddin Owaisi and AIMPLB office-bearers Maulana Wali Rahmani, Zafaryab Jilani and Qasim Rasool Ilyas for raising the issue of review.

published on : 22nd November 2019

'Tactic to delay Ram temple': Hindu parties on AIMPLB move to file Ayodhya review plea

Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas head Mahant Nritya Gopal Das flayed the AIMPLB’s decision saying it was meant to put a stumbling block in the path of temple construction.

published on : 18th November 2019

Ayodhya case: Nirmohi Akhara plans to meet PM Modi this week to demand inclusion in Ram Mandir construction trust

The SC on November 9 had cleared the way for the construction of the temple at the disputed site here and directed the Centre to allot a 5-acre plot to the Sunni Waqf Board for building a mosque.

published on : 18th November 2019

Nirmohi Akhara convenes meeting to discuss future course of action on Ayodhya verdict

The meeting chaired by the head of Nirmohi Akhara, Mahant Dinendra Das, was also attended by its Sarpanch Raja Ram Chandra Das here.

published on : 17th November 2019

Supreme Court invokes Article 142 to grant relief to Muslim parties, Nirmohi Akhara

The top court observed that in the exercise of its powers under Article 142 of the Constitution must ensure a wrong committed should be remedied.

published on : 10th November 2019

How parties staked their claims on disputed Ayodhya land

 Once a mosque, always a mosque: Prayers were stopped in 1950, but there is no concept of abandoning a mosque  Hindu parties only staked claim to right to worship in 1950 suits, not title.

published on : 10th November 2019

No regret over SC saying Nirmohi Akhara not 'shebait' of deity Ram Lalla: Outfit

A bench headed by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi said the Akhara's suit was barred by limitation.

published on : 9th November 2019

High Court verdict on three-way division of land failed to settle dispute

The Allahabad HC had dismissed the suit filed by the Sunni Waqf Board for possession of the Babri Masjid because it was time-barred.

published on : 9th November 2019

Ayodhya hearing: Muslim parties rubbish Nirmohi Akhara's claim on namaz

The Akhara had told the five-judge Constitution bench that the Muslims were not offering regular namaz at the disputed site from 1934 to 1949.

published on : 12th September 2019

Ayodhya dispute: SC asks Muslims if they accept Akhara's claim on land despite claims of witnesses

A witness, who had testified in over 200 cases, believed that there was 'no harm in telling a lie' if a place has been forcibly taken away.

published on : 5th September 2019

Nirmohi Akhara unnecessarily opposing deity's plea, both stand or fall together in Ayodhya case: SC

The bench asked the Hindu body to show the documents and confine its arguments on its right as 'shebait'.

published on : 27th August 2019

Ayodhya hearing: Supreme Court tells Nirmohi Akhara claim of devotee can not be adverse to deity

On Thursday, the Akhara claimed it was the sole 'shebait' of Ram Lalla at the disputed site, prompting the court to say if it was so the Akhara cannot have the title over disputed land.

published on : 23rd August 2019

If Nirmohi Akhara claims 'shabaitship' of deity, it would lose title right over disputed land: Supreme Court

Akhara claimed to be the sole official 'shabait' of deity 'Ram Lalla Virajman' at the disputed site since time immemorial and had said that that it had been appointing 'priest' for worship there.

published on : 22nd August 2019

Ayodhya dispute: SC asks for land records, Nirmohi Akhara claims they were stolen in 1982

Counsel Sushil Jain informed the bench that a dacoity took place in 1982 and they lost all the records, proving their ownership, in this incident.

published on : 7th August 2019

Ayodhya site: Muslims offered only Friday prayers from 1934-49, says Nirmohi Akhara

Akhara specifically argued that no Muslim could or ever did enter the temple Building or has even attempted to enter the structure at least since 1934.

published on : 6th August 2019