Pakistani Lawyer Starts New Battle Over Koh-i-Noor Diamond's Ownership

Ever since it was plucked from an Indian gem mine sometime in the 13th century, it has been the subject of feuds between monarchs and empires.

Published: 09th February 2016 10:51 AM  |   Last Updated: 09th February 2016 10:51 AM   |  A+A-

ISLAMABAD: Ever since it was plucked from an Indian gem mine sometime in the 13th century, it has been the subject of feuds between monarchs and empires.

Now, more than 150 years after it found its way from the Punjab to the royal household of Queen Victoria, the Koh-i-Noor diamond is yet again the subject of competing claims. The latest person to lay claim to the 105-carat gem, which is kept in the Tower of London, is a British-trained Pakistani lawyer who has brought petition on behalf of his country in a local court.

Yesterday, a judge in Lahore accepted the petition from Javed Iqbal Jaffry, who wants the gem repatriated from this country.

India has also long laid claim to the diamond, which was acquired by the British in 1849 when the East India Company annexed the region of Punjab. But in his lawsuit, Mr Jaffry argues that the Koh-i-Noor actually belongs to his countrymen. He says that the gem hailed from territory that became part of Pakistan in the post-war partition.

The ruling sets the stage for a complex three-way claim on what was once the largest known diamond in the world. It is set in a crown last worn by the late Queen Elizabeth for her coronation with George VI in 1937, and which was displayed on top of her coffin when it lay in state after her death in 2002. The registrar for the Lahore High Court rejected the petition on paperwork grounds in December. But a judge has now accepted the case, meaning it will proceed to a further hearing.

Mr Jaffry has named the Queen and the British High Commission in Islamabad as respondents in his case, but his lawsuit is aimed at forcing the Pakistan government to press Britain for the diamond's return.

The mission has been a lifetime cause for the London-trained lawyer, who has written 786 letters on the matter to the Queen and to Pakistani officials. "Koh-i-Noor was not legitimately acquired," he wrote in his filing. "Grabbing and snatching it was a private, illegal act which is justified by no law or ethics. A wrong is a wrong. It does not become righteous or right by passage of time or even acquiescence."

He argued that Britain "forcibly and under duress" stole the diamond from Duleep Singh, the grandson of Maharaja Ranjit Singh.

In 1850, Britain's governor-general of India arranged for the diamond to be presented to Queen Victoria. Punjab was split between India and Pakistan in the partition of the Raj in 1947.

Mr Jaffry told The Daily Telegraph: "The Koh-i-Noor was snatched illegally from the 14-year-old ruler of Punjab, from Lahore, by the East India British Company. It was gifted to Queen Victoria, but she never used it in her crown.

"The East India Company ruled Punjab, but the question is how can a company be the ruler of any country, so how can you legislate for its actions?

"I want to establish the Koh-i-Noor's status as a cultural object of Pakistan. I also request the court to order the government of Pakistan to raise the issue with the British government."

Indians have long demanded the return of the Koh-i-Noor, which was owned by several Mughal emperors and Maharajas. Keith Vaz, the Labour MP, made the latest such call before the visit to London in November of Narendra Modi, the Indian prime minister.

Britain has consistently rejected Indian claims on the gem, in the same way it has ignored Greek demands for the return of the Elgin Marbles. During a visit to India in 2010, David Cameron said: "What tends to happen with these questions is that if you say yes to one, then you would suddenly find the British Museum empty."


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp