US President Trump asks Supreme Court for full enforcement of travel ban

Last month, a federal judge in Hawaii had blocked most of Trump's third travel ban just before it was due to take effect.

Published: 21st November 2017 10:11 AM  |   Last Updated: 21st November 2017 12:17 PM   |  A+A-

People gather for a protest against President Donald Trump's new travel ban order in Lafayette Park outside the White House, Monday, March 6, 2017 (Photo | AP)

File image for representation- People gather for a protest against President Donald Trump's travel ban order (Photo | AP)

By Associated Press

HONOLULU: The Trump administration has asked the US Supreme Court to allow the latest travel ban to take full effect.

A federal appeals court ruling last week allowed President Donald Trump's newest version of the ban to partially take effect. That ruling by the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals allowed the administration to ban people from six mostly Muslim countries unless they have a "bona fide" relationship with someone in the US.

Last month, a federal judge in Hawaii had blocked most of Trump's third travel ban just before it was due to take effect. A judge in Maryland separately blocked it to a lesser degree, saying Trump could bar people from Chad, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Syria and Yemen as long as they did not have "bona fide" relationships with people or organizations already in the US.

The travel ban also applies to travelers from North Korea and to some Venezuelan government officials and their families, but the lawsuits did not challenge those restrictions.

The application filed Monday by the US Justice Department asked the Supreme Court to put the Hawaii judge's ruling on hold.

Preventing the president from enforcing "his national- security and foreign-relations judgment will cause ongoing irreparable harm to the government and the public, especially by requiring the executive to disregard the identified inadequacies and by undermining the proclamation's goal of inducing cooperation by other nations," the government's application said.

If granted, the full ban would be in effect while the government's appeal makes its way through the courts.

Hawaii Attorney General Doug Chin said Monday, "We look forward to the Supreme Court's review of this matter, and to the oral argument before the court of appeals in two weeks." Arguments are scheduled for December 6 at the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals in Seattle. The Maryland case is due to be argued before the 4th US Circuit Court of Appeals on December 8.

In a separate 9th Circuit ruling Monday, a request by six states to intervene in the Hawaii lawsuit was denied.

California, Maryland, Massachusetts, New York, Oregon and Washington filed a motion last month asking to be parties in Hawaii's lawsuit. They agree with Hawaii that the ban is unconstitutional.


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp