STOCK MARKET BSE NSE

Papua New Guinea demands end to Australia refugee contract 

From 2012 to 2017 Australia ran detention facilities on Manus under a hardline policy of turning back anyone trying to arrive in the country by sea, including refugees fleeing wars and unrest

Published: 25th June 2019 12:59 PM  |   Last Updated: 25th June 2019 12:59 PM   |  A+A-

A representational image of Rohingyas

For representational purposes

By AFP

PORT MORESBY: Australia must end or completely rework a controversial multi-million dollar contract to manage refugees stuck in tropical island camps, Papua New Guinea's prime minister demanded on Tuesday.

"I will ask the Australian government to stop this contract forthwith," James Marape told parliament, saying the arrangement should be "reviewed to the fullest, or we ask for this contract to be terminated."

Marape said the Paladin Group's contract to manage facilities on Manus Island holding around 500 refugees and asylum seekers turned away by Australia must include local companies.

ALSO READ: Indian asylum seeker faces charges over attempted suicide in Papua New Guinea

The contract, worth over AUD 400 million (USD 280) over the last two years, has been the subject of deep controversy.

From 2012 to 2017 Australia ran detention facilities on Manus under a hardline policy of turning back anyone trying to arrive in the country by sea, including refugees fleeing wars and unrest as far afield as Sudan and Iranian Kurdistan.

But after the PNG Supreme Court ruled the arrangement unconstitutional, Australia handed the camps over to local authorities, with daily management of security and other operations were given to Paladin, a little-known private company, under a contract issued without any competitive tender.

The 500 men still on Manus have been in the island camps for at least five years.

In recent weeks the camps have seen a rash of suicide attempts as refugees and asylum seekers try to draw international attention to their plight.

The Paladin contract which reportedly does not include food or medical care, has been backed by Australian home affairs minister Peter Dutton who has advocated for an extension.

Marape seemed to shoot down that possibility, at least without significant revisions.

"We don't intend for foreign contractors to operate here in business like security. These are businesses that local companies can participate in," he told a regular session of question time.

Marape called on his foreign affairs and immigration ministers to convey his message to Canberra "at the earliest".



Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp