Centre seeks ban on female genital mutilation, Supreme Court gives nod

A bench headed by Chief Justice Dipak Misra was told by Attorney General K K Venugopal, that the practice causes irreparable harm to girl children and needed to be banned.

Published: 09th July 2018 11:34 PM  |   Last Updated: 10th July 2018 12:10 AM   |  A+A-

Supreme Court (File| PTI)

By Express News Service

NEW DELHI: The Centre sought ban on female genital mutilation (FGM) on Monday and told the Supreme Court it was opposed to any such practice in the name of religion as it violates integrity of her body part.

Attorney General K K Venugopal, appearing for the Centre told a Bench of Chief Justice Dipak Misra that the government was in favour of a ban on religious practices that force girl child to undergo genital mutilation or circumcision.

He told the bench, which also had Justices A M Khanwilkar and D Y Chandrachud, that countries like the USA, the United Kingdom, Australia and around 27 African countries have banned this practice.

Senior Counsel Indira Jaising, appearing for the petitioner, told the Court that there are adverse consequences and trauma brought upon the girls in their adult life after they are subjected to this practice.

The observations came during the hearing of a petition filed by advocate Sunita Tiwari seeking a ban on FMG.

Senior counsel Abhishek Manu Singhvi, who appeared for Dawoodi Bohra community, however justified FMG contending that it has the sanction of religious texts and said, “It is an essential aspect of Islam and cannot be subjected to judicial scrutiny.”

"Why and how should the bodily integrity of an individual can be part of the religion and its essential practice," the bench asked, adding the practice violated the "integrity" of a girl child's body.

"Why should anybody else will have any control over the genitals of an individual," it said.

The court scheduled the case for hearing on July 16.

During the brief hearing, Venugopal reiterated the Centre's stand and said that the practice violated various fundamental rights of the girl child and moreover, such kind of genital mutilation has serious repercussions on their health.

Singhvi, on the other hand, referred to the practice of male circumcision (khatna) in Islam and said that it has been allowed in all countries and this is the accepted religious practice and sought adjournment of the hearing.

Earlier, the apex court had ordered Kerala and Telangana to be made parties to a PIL that has challenged the practice of female genital mutilation of minor girls of the Dawoodi Bohra Muslim community.

It ordered that states like Kerala and Telangana, where Bohra Muslim community reside, should also be made parties to the litigation and issued notice to them as well.

The states which are already party to the case are Maharashtra, Gujarat, Rajasthan and Union Territory Delhi.

The court had on May 8 agreed to examine the issues raised by Delhi-based lawyer Sunita Tiwari by saying that the practice of female genital mutilation was "extremely important and sensitive".

It had issued notices and sought replies from four Union ministries, including the Woman and Child Development, besides Maharashtra, Gujarat, Rajasthan and Delhi where Dawoodi Bohras, who are Shia Muslims, predominantly reside.

Tiwari, in her plea, has sought a direction to the Centre and the states to "impose a complete ban on the inhuman practice" of 'khatna' or "female genital mutilation" (FGM) throughout the country.

The plea has sought a direction to make FGM an offence on which the law enforcement agencies can take cognisance on their own.

It has also sought to make the offence "non-compoundable and non-bailable" with provision for harsh punishment.

The ministries of Law and Justice, Social Justice and Empowerment have also been made parties to the plea which referred to various conventions of the United Nations, to which India is a signatory.

The practice of female genital mutilation resulted in "serious violations of basic fundamental rights of the victims who in these cases are minors," the plea said.

The FGM is performed "illegally upon girls (between five years and before she attains puberty)" and is against the "UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights of which is India is a signatory", the plea said, adding the practice caused "permanent disfiguration to the body of a girl child".

"The practice of 'khatna' or 'FGM' or 'Khafd' also amounts to causing inequality between the sexes and constitutes discrimination against women. Since it is carried out on minors, it amounts to serious violation of the rights of children as even minors have a right of security of person, right to privacy, bodily integrity and the freedom from cruel, inhumane or degrading treatment," the plea said."

It is a ritual performed on every girl child within the Dawoodi Bohra religious community without any medical reason and does not have any reference in the Quran.

"It violates the rights of the child and human rights. It also violates the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and is a crime in the Unites States of America under the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 and now a crime in Australia and some other countries as well," it claimed.

"There is no law in India banning FGM or Khatna to declare it illegal," it added.

(with PTI inputs)

Stay up to date on all the latest Nation news with The New Indian Express App. Download now
(Get the news that matters from New Indian Express on WhatsApp. Click this link and hit 'Click to Subscribe'. Follow the instructions after that.)

Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

facebook twitter whatsapp