Supreme Court adjourns hearing on Ayodhya case till January 2019

Although the hearing is likely to begin in January next year, the date will be fixed by an appropriate bench, the Supreme Court said.

Published: 29th October 2018 12:06 PM  |   Last Updated: 30th October 2018 06:44 AM   |  A+A-

Supreme Court

Supreme Court (File | EPS)

By Express News Service

NEW DELHI: With the Supreme Court on Monday refusing to prioritise hearing of the Ram Janambhoomi-Babri Masjid title suit, with the earliest window opening only in January, its verdict in all probability will not be out before the 2019 Lok Sabha elections.

“We will fix the date of hearing of the Ayodhya dispute case before the appropriate bench in January,” a three-judge first bench of Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi and justices S K Kaul and K M Joseph said.

When Solicitor General Tushar Mehta and senior advocate C S Vaidyanathan, appearing for the UP government and deity Ramlala respectively, sought early listing in view of the long pendency of the case, the bench shot back: “We have our own priorities. Whether the matter will be heard in January, February or March, the appropriate bench will decide.”

The court may be hoping the verdict does not vitiate the atmosphere ahead of the general elections, but that would perhaps not prevent the stakeholders from making it a poll plank.

UP Deputy Chief Minister Keshav Maurya appeared grumpy. “I don’t want to comment on the SC’s position but it won’t send a good message down the line,” he said.

For its part, the Vishwa Hindu Parishad demanded that the Centre bring in a law to build the temple.

“We will not keep on waiting till eternity. This fortifies the VHP’s stand that the solution to the Ram Janmabhoomi issue is not in eternally waiting for hearing of appeals pending for over seven years,” said VHP’s working president Alok Kumar.

Even saints in Ayodhya appeared upset. Mahant Paramhans Das, who had been on fast unto death recently demanding a firm schedule for building the Ram temple, said the BJP government should now pave the way for temple construction at the earliest. “If this is not done, BJP, VHP and RSS will have to face the consequences in 2019 Lok Sabha elections,” he warned.

Bharatiya Sant Samiti chief Swami Jitendranand Saraswati said he would pressure the Centre to bring a law for temple construction in the winter session of Parliament. However, Nirmohi Akhada, a party to the title suit, was okay with the SC position.

Ramjanmabhoomi chief priest Satyendra Das said only the SC could solve the matter and both parties were ready to abide by its order. Litigant Iqbal Ansari, son of Hashim Ansari (the first Muslim litigant who went to court in 1961), echoed Das saying the court’s decision would be acceptable to him.

Jan-end dharma sansad by VHP during kumbh mela to act as pressure point

While RSS spokesperson Arun Kumar said the SC should deliver an early verdict and the government should enact a law to remove hurdles in the way of giving land for a temple, if required, the BJP brass chose to remain silent.

Political tempo around the issue is expected to build up during the forthcoming Kumbh Mela, when a Dharma Sansad will be convened by the VHP on January 31 and February 1 to discuss it. Congress leader Anand Sharma advised patience.

“Everyone should patiently wait for the verdict. Congress will welcome and accept the Supreme Court verdict,” he said

Stay up to date on all the latest Nation news with The New Indian Express App. Download now
(Get the news that matters from New Indian Express on WhatsApp. Click this link and hit 'Click to Subscribe'. Follow the instructions after that.)


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

  • Hiralal

    With justice gogoi as the presiding judge
    2 months ago reply
  • Navneet Bhatnagar

    The Court is hyper active in any case , where rights of Hindus get affected negatively. But lacks will and grit to pronounce decisions in cases, where non- Hindu interests could get jeopardised. How many more CJIs will come and go before Ayodhya issue is adjudicated upon by the judiciary ? They just go on giving dates in cases , to cover up for their own inefficiencies but want CVC to probe CBI Director within 14 days. Utter hypocricy.
    2 months ago reply
  • Vivek Rao

    This is not a surprise : On all matters contenscious PROCRASTINATE This is the real reason why we are so backward the SC is wasting everyone's time with these adjournments . Earlier some CJI advised best thing was for it to be out of court with CJI sitting as adjudicator and now these justices are kicking it down the roasd - Come On BJP Legsilate and let the SC interpret the legislatoion which is it's role
    2 months ago reply
flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp